2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Pediatric Appendicitis using Ensemble Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the WBBN model undergoes thorough training and testing using a distinct distribution of the PIDD dataset comprising 768 records. The primary evaluative parameter employed in this study is accuracy, which is the correctness of predictions made by a predictive model for diabetes diagnosis or classification (Nayak et al, 2023;Panigrahi et al, 2023;Pati et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the WBBN model undergoes thorough training and testing using a distinct distribution of the PIDD dataset comprising 768 records. The primary evaluative parameter employed in this study is accuracy, which is the correctness of predictions made by a predictive model for diabetes diagnosis or classification (Nayak et al, 2023;Panigrahi et al, 2023;Pati et al, 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A system with Windows 11, an Intel Core i7 CPU with 3.8 GHz clock speed, 16 GB of RAM, and 500 GB SSD is used to evaluate the proposed ensemble models. Following a methodical experimental procedure, these performance measures hope to build a class confusion matrix closer to reality than expectations [24], [25]. Performance evaluations in this research may be done using several performance indicators, such as Accuracy (AC), precision (PR), balanced accuracy (BA), mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), F1-score (FS), specificity (SP), and sensitivity (SN) [26], [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model is developed on a workstation with 32GB of RAM, 1 TB of SSD storage, an Intel Core i7 processor, and a Ubuntu 20.04 operating system. The predictive model's performance can be evaluated in several ways [25][26][27]. This study was conducted with the Integrated CVD dataset in mind, along with four other HDDs that can be downloaded for free from the UCI-ML repository and a handful of performance metrics like accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-Score, etc., as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%