2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting overall survivability in comorbidity of cancers: A data mining approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Explanation requires only cross validation whereas prediction requires intertemporal validation, which implies testing predictive results over time [35]. [36,37] and credit scoring [38,39]. CHAID is a recursive partitioning method that for regression-type problems relies on the F-square test to determine the best next split at each step.…”
Section: Decision Trees Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanation requires only cross validation whereas prediction requires intertemporal validation, which implies testing predictive results over time [35]. [36,37] and credit scoring [38,39]. CHAID is a recursive partitioning method that for regression-type problems relies on the F-square test to determine the best next split at each step.…”
Section: Decision Trees Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prediction methods are examined by the means of train‐test split, and Gradient Boosting is selected as the predictor due to its superior performance. Given the outcome of the experiments run here, it is observed that in the proposed model, the accuracy, error, sensitivity, and specificity rates in predicting survival in cancer comorbidity is improved compared with the methods assessed by Zolbanin et al () in almost all cases, Table .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The sub‐categories: YR1973_2011.SEER9 YR1992_2011.SJ_LA_RG_AK YR2000_2011.CA_KY_LO_NJ_GA YR2005.LO_2ND_HALF The files, in ASCII file format: BREAST.TXT: Women breast cancer COLRECT.TXT: Colon and anus cancer DIGOTHR.TXT: Gastrointestinal cancer FEMGEN.TXT: Female genital cancer LYMYLEUK.TXT: Lymphoma of all sites and leukaemia MALEGEN.TXT: Men's genital system cancers RESPIR.TXT: Respiratory Cancer URINARY.TXT: Men urinary cancer OTHER.TXT: Other cases It should be noted that SEER data set applied in this study is that of 1973–2013, whereas in Zolbanin et al () the same data set applied is that of 1993‐2011. Regarding the difference in the dates of the two data sets, it is not possible to compare the results of this proposed method with Zolbanin et al in a direct manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations