2012
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31824b00ac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury

Abstract: Our validated prognostic models have good performance and are generalizable to be used to predict outcome of new patients. We recommend the use of prognostic models to complement clinical decision making.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A smooth, nonparametric calibration line created by the Lowess algorithm was used to graphically assess the models’ calibrative abilities [12]. The H-L test used the hl.ext R code written by Steyerberg [13]. In the H-L tests, p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smooth, nonparametric calibration line created by the Lowess algorithm was used to graphically assess the models’ calibrative abilities [12]. The H-L test used the hl.ext R code written by Steyerberg [13]. In the H-L tests, p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the performance power of the GCS scores on admission and PTH were similarly able to affect the patient's outcome (p = 0.623), and both of them were significantly better predictives than craniectomy site or postoperative PHI (p < 0.05), respectively. (Khalili et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2012), and ICP (Khalili et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2012). However, few studies investigated the association between postoperative complications and the long-term outcomes of DC in adult patients with TBI as we did in this study.…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2012), GCS scores(Khalili et al, 2016;Lemcke, Ahmadi, & Meier, 2010), pupillary reactivity(Kamal et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2012), CT findings(Khalili et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2012), and ICP(Khalili et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2012). However, few studies investigated the association between postoperative complications and the long-term outcomes of DC in adult patients with TBI as we did in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Predictors we used in this study, including age, gender, coagulation status and components of circulating blood sample, can be readily obtained on admission, and their prognostic value had previously been con rmed either in tSCI or TBI patients. [4,[15][16][17] The counts of WBCs and its components, including neutrophils ratio, lymphocytes ratio and NLR, are readily available lab tests with standardized results, although rarely studied, it is reasonable to include these results into this prognostic model. Favorable prognostic value of circulating NLR at admission had been reported in ICH and TBI patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] Studies have identi ed several widely used standard prognostic factors at admission such as international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), platelet counts (PLT), age, Charleson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), American spinal injury association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades, and the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, to be associated with the outcome of tSCI patients. [4,5] Several predictive models have been built based on these factors, however, their prognostic values were limited. Thus, to develop a model with higher prognostic value is justi ed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%