2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0043018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting operational windows of ELMs suppression by resonant magnetic perturbations in the DIII-D and KSTAR tokamaks

Abstract: A newly developed plasma response model, combining the nonlinear two-fluid MHD code TM1 and toroidal MHD code GPEC run in ideal mode, quantitatively predicts the narrow isolated q95 windows (Δq95 ∼ 0.1) of edge-localized mode (ELM) suppression by n = 1, 2, and 3 resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) in both DIII-D and KSTAR tokamaks across a wide range of plasma parameters. The key physics that unites both experimental observations and our simulations is the close alignment of essential resonant q-surfaces an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon of density 'pump-out' typically seen with RMP application is also far from being fully understood. The possible candidates as E × B convective transport [26], NTV particle drift [22], polarization current [29] and increased turbulence with RMPs [30] were proposed by theory and modelling, but for the moment there is no global approach combining all these mechanisms which possibly all play a role in density 'pump-out'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of density 'pump-out' typically seen with RMP application is also far from being fully understood. The possible candidates as E × B convective transport [26], NTV particle drift [22], polarization current [29] and increased turbulence with RMPs [30] were proposed by theory and modelling, but for the moment there is no global approach combining all these mechanisms which possibly all play a role in density 'pump-out'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare with the conventional feed-forward cases reported by KSTAR [17,29], the RMP configuration was set to n = 1 with 90 • phasing. In addition, q 95 is set around 4.8 right after the H-mode transition time at t = 3.14 s. When the first ELM crash occurs, q 95 ≈ 4.9. q 95 for the reference discharge at the H-mode transition moment is near the lower bound for the n = 1 ELM crash suppression [29,30].…”
Section: Setup For the Reference H-mode Dischargementioning
confidence: 78%
“…应与等离子体边缘剥离模的稳定性有关, 对 ASDEX Upgrade [30] 和 ITER [40] 的模拟 研究也证明了这一点。 研究表明这个特定区域通常为等离子体边缘台基区, 显然, 新有理面经过等离子体边缘台基区时, 有理面处的大磁岛更容易加速该区域粒子 的径向输运,从而有利于实现 ELMs 的控制 [47]…”
Section: 数值模拟结果unclassified