2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40242-022-1452-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Membrane-based Isobutene/1,3-Butadiene Separation: Combining Molecular Simulation and Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qiao et al used the ML approach to compute the relative importance of MOF features on the predicted membrane selectivities and showed that porosity and the largest cavity diameter (LCD) have high importance. Zhong et al developed an ML model to predict i -C 4 H 8 permeability and i -C 4 H 8 /C 4 H 6 selectivity of 601 covalent organic framework (COF) membranes at 1 bar, 298 K, and showed that porosity and pore limiting diameter (PLD) are key factors controlling the selectivity and permeability of COF membranes. Bai et al recently developed eight different ML algorithms to predict H 2 permeability, H 2 /CH 4 membrane selectivity, and trade-off multiple selectivity and permeability (TMSP) of MOFs and showed that two ML models are the most suitable ones for predicting the H 2 separation performances of MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qiao et al used the ML approach to compute the relative importance of MOF features on the predicted membrane selectivities and showed that porosity and the largest cavity diameter (LCD) have high importance. Zhong et al developed an ML model to predict i -C 4 H 8 permeability and i -C 4 H 8 /C 4 H 6 selectivity of 601 covalent organic framework (COF) membranes at 1 bar, 298 K, and showed that porosity and pore limiting diameter (PLD) are key factors controlling the selectivity and permeability of COF membranes. Bai et al recently developed eight different ML algorithms to predict H 2 permeability, H 2 /CH 4 membrane selectivity, and trade-off multiple selectivity and permeability (TMSP) of MOFs and showed that two ML models are the most suitable ones for predicting the H 2 separation performances of MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…357 Cao et al combined machine learning with molecular separations to identify COFs for membrane separation using membrane performance score (MPS) and selectivity. 289 Desgranges et al used ensemble ML methodology to predict the partition function of fluids adsorbed in MOFs and COFs. 358 The prediction of partition function over a wide range of conditions allows access to thermodynamic properties of adsorption, such as adsorption isotherm, entropy, and Gibbs free energy of the adsorbed fluid.…”
Section: Processes For Carbon Capture Using Cofs: Developments and Ch...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fanourgakis et al 33 employed a self-consistent ML approach to decrease the cost of molecular simulations and identified the top COFs for CH 4 storage among 69,840 hypoCOFs. Cao et al 34 35 Recently, our group developed ML models to screen CoRE COFs and hypoCOFs for CH 4 /H 2 separation and showed that pore size and heat of adsorption of gases are the main factors determining the separation performance of COFs. 36 Motivated from the great potential of harnessing HTCS and ML methods to examine a large number and variety of materials, in this work, we evaluated all synthesized and hypothetical COFs, 613 CoRE COFs and 69,840 hypoCOFs, for CO 2 /CH 4 separation under four different processes: PSA, VSA, TSA, and PTSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%