2021
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg4778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting non-state terrorism worldwide

Abstract: Several thousand people die every year worldwide because of terrorist attacks perpetrated by non-state actors. In this context, reliable and accurate short-term predictions of non-state terrorism at the local level are key for policy makers to target preventative measures. Using only publicly available data, we show that predictive models that include structural and procedural predictors can accurately predict the occurrence of non-state terrorism locally and a week ahead in regions affected by a relatively hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XGBoost is based on a gradient‐boosting decision tree method (Friedman, 2001) and has been recently applied in a wide range of applications aiming to predict complex spatial phenomena at the global scale (e.g., Cook‐Patton et al., 2020; Python et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). XGBoost uses a gradient‐descent algorithm to minimize the loss when adding new models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XGBoost is based on a gradient‐boosting decision tree method (Friedman, 2001) and has been recently applied in a wide range of applications aiming to predict complex spatial phenomena at the global scale (e.g., Cook‐Patton et al., 2020; Python et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). XGBoost uses a gradient‐descent algorithm to minimize the loss when adding new models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our task is to predict terrorist attacks or events, which is distinct from works that have sought to infer characteristics of an attack, such as the responsible group, after it has taken place [2,5,31,32]. Few works have attempted to predictively model terrorist attacks, with the recent work of Python et al being the noteworthy exception [25]. In this study, the authors train several machine learning models using prior terrorism data (from the GTD) in conjunction with other geographic and socioeconomic features to predict attacks at discrete spatiotemporal intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our task is to predict the occurrence of attacks or events, which is distinct from works that have sought to infer characteristics of an attack, such as the responsible group, after it has taken place [ 5 9 ]. Few works have attempted to predictively model terrorist attacks, with the recent work of Python et al being one exception [ 10 ]. The authors trained several machine learning models using prior terrorism data (from the GTD) in conjunction with other geographic and socioeconomic features to predict attacks at discrete spatiotemporal intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make meaningful predictions at a granular timescale (e.g., will a terrorist attack take place during a given week), models must have inputs of a similar temporal granularity in order to differentiate between points in time. Many of the inputs utilized by Python et al in [ 10 ] are relatively static, such as population density and gross domestic product (GDP). The only temporally granular inputs were autoregressions based on local terrorist activity (i.e., whether there were recent terrorist attacks in the location of concern).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%