1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90244-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
2
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
6
114
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of this change was due to gains in the lower extremity, consistent with IE therapy content. Motor gains were seen in 71% of IE subjects, which compares favorably with the natural history of chronic SCI, 22 where one study reported that 40% of subjects with SCI have show motor improvement over a 5-year period, though no information was available regarding therapy during that study. Importantly, in approximately one-third of subjects in the current IE group, motor gains included having at least one muscle change from non-functional to functional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most of this change was due to gains in the lower extremity, consistent with IE therapy content. Motor gains were seen in 71% of IE subjects, which compares favorably with the natural history of chronic SCI, 22 where one study reported that 40% of subjects with SCI have show motor improvement over a 5-year period, though no information was available regarding therapy during that study. Importantly, in approximately one-third of subjects in the current IE group, motor gains included having at least one muscle change from non-functional to functional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] The data from the placebo-control groups in these studies allow the natural history of recovery from injury to be examined within the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In addition, there have been a number of studies of long-term outcomes after SCI that provide valuable information on expected recovery rates, [10][11][12] as well as some recently unpublished data from the European Multicenter study in Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI).…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origins of this test date back a number of decades. 4,5 Slight variants of this test have served as the primary outcome measure of neurologic status in a number of multi-center studies of drug treatment strategies to minimize secondary injury after acute SCI. 6,7 Like its predecessors, the ASIA scale includes testing of a number of muscles in both upper and lower-limbs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%