2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PAMI risk score)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
151
0
19

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
151
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In many ways our analysis confirms not only the importance but also the ordering of clinical factors that have been repeatedly demonstrated as strong predictors of outcome following AMI [26][27][28]. Not surprisingly, patients with cardiogenic shock were identified as the highest risk group followed by those with congestive heart failure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many ways our analysis confirms not only the importance but also the ordering of clinical factors that have been repeatedly demonstrated as strong predictors of outcome following AMI [26][27][28]. Not surprisingly, patients with cardiogenic shock were identified as the highest risk group followed by those with congestive heart failure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These risk factors were identified even in the earliest of risk stratification schemes, the Killip classification [29]. Besides the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI) risk score that excludes cardiogenic shock patients [26], perhaps our model is the only other risk model that doesn't require angiographic variables prior to risk stratification. Therefore, potential application of our model includes the efficient and early identification of high-risk groups in whom not only therapy may be tailored to risk, but also allow a frank discussion of risks and benefits of potential treatment strategies such as cardiac catheterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These clinical and demographic factors have been recognized as important risk factors among patients with MI in clinical guidelines 29. Moreover, these risk factors are incorporated in a number of risk prediction models for patients with MI 6, 7, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous bedside tools have been developed to stratify patients with STEMI to identify a low-risk group of patients who are unlikely to experience complications above the background rate and who can be discharged from the hospital after a brief period of observation. The Zwolle primary PCI index (4) [7] and TIMI-STEMI [8]) and clearly identifies a majority of patients who can be discharged early. Although a more comprehensive score in the setting of primary PCI has since been reported (ie, the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications [CADILLAC] [9] score), we found that the Zwolle score was practical as a clinical bedside tool, with the ability to discriminate between high-and low-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%