1989
DOI: 10.1177/0013164489492019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Later Academic Achievement from Kindergarten Scores on the Metropolitan Readiness Tests and the Lollipop Test

Abstract: The long-term predictive validities of the Metropolitan Readiness Tests (MRT) and the Lollipop Test: A Diagnostic Screening Test of School Readiness were examined. The achievement of 246 students in reading and mathematics as measured by the Stanford Achievement Test and teacher assigned grades in first, third, and fourth grades was predicted from kindergarten administrations of each of these test batteries. All multiple correlations for the Lollipop Test and the MRT were found to be significant and similar in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, all children who completed the Lollipop completed all four scales; accordingly, use of the total score was appropriate. This score correlates highly (r = .76) with that on the Metropolitan Readiness Tests (Chew & Morris, 1984), and has been shown to predict school achievement (Eno & Woehlke, 1995) up to 4th grade (Chew & Morris, 1989).…”
Section: Less Is Morementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the current study, all children who completed the Lollipop completed all four scales; accordingly, use of the total score was appropriate. This score correlates highly (r = .76) with that on the Metropolitan Readiness Tests (Chew & Morris, 1984), and has been shown to predict school achievement (Eno & Woehlke, 1995) up to 4th grade (Chew & Morris, 1989).…”
Section: Less Is Morementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chew and Lang (1990) and Chew and Morris (1989) showed that Lollipop Test's domains mapped closely to those tested on DIAL-R and the Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT; Swanson, Payne, & Jackson, 1981) yet required a shorter testing time. Neither the Lollipop nor the MRT have specific "readiness levels" used to classify children as ready or not; their main purpose is to predict first grade academic success from a kindergarten testing.…”
Section: Resumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lollipop Test, a well-validated diagnostic test of school readiness, is composed of four subtests: identification of colors and shapes and copying shapes; picture description, position, and spatial recognition; identification of numbers and counting; identification of letters and writing . Kindergarten scores predict academic achievement up to grade four (Chew & Morris, 1989). Receptive vocabulary was assessed using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) in either of Canada's two official languages: French and English (Dunn & Dunn, 1981;Dunn, Theriault-Whalen, & Dunn, 1993).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%