2003
DOI: 10.1080/136820310000104830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting language outcome in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder

Abstract: Individual differences in infant social-communication abilities as well as diagnosis may predict language outcome in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Attention should be directed at assessing these skills in 2- and 3-year-old children referred for a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Imitation and joint attention abilities may be important targets for early intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
206
1
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
16
206
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Thurm, Lord, Lee, and Newschaffer (2007) reported that cognition at age 2, but not age 3, was a significant predictor of expressive language at age 5. In contrast, Charman, Baron-Cohen, et al (2003) found that cognition at age 3 was predictive of expressive language abilities at age 7 whereas cognition at age 2 was not. Given that cognition is related to concurrent and later language abilities in toddlers with ASD across the majority of research studies, we chose to investigate if there were significant differences in cognition in children with different expressive language profiles.…”
Section: Variables That Influence Language Development In Toddlers Wimentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For example, Thurm, Lord, Lee, and Newschaffer (2007) reported that cognition at age 2, but not age 3, was a significant predictor of expressive language at age 5. In contrast, Charman, Baron-Cohen, et al (2003) found that cognition at age 3 was predictive of expressive language abilities at age 7 whereas cognition at age 2 was not. Given that cognition is related to concurrent and later language abilities in toddlers with ASD across the majority of research studies, we chose to investigate if there were significant differences in cognition in children with different expressive language profiles.…”
Section: Variables That Influence Language Development In Toddlers Wimentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Several studies indicate that imitating or copying patterns in a partner's gesture, sequential movements, and behaviors is a key predictor of language outcome in children with ASD (Charman & Baron-Cohe, 1994;Charman et al, 2003;Paul & Sutherland, 2005). Such researchers have suggested that imitation may be a developmental precursor of communicative behaviors for children with autism.…”
Section: Language Acquisition In Children With Asd: Development Of Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They pointed to accumulating evidence, much from their own research, supporting the idea that alterations in the separate defining domains of social relatedness, language/communication, and restricted interest/repetitive behavior are separable and suggested that genetic and behavioral approaches that consider autism as an entity or unitary phenomenon may be inefficient and counterproductive. Evidence marshaled in support of the separable or fractionable approach includes the smooth continua of severity seen for domain traits [Constantino and Todd, 2003;Spiker et al, 2002], the occurrence of autism-related traits in isolation in family members and the general population [Bolton et al, 1998;Murphy et al, 2000;Ronald et al, 2006a,b], the modest within-individual correlations seen for the different domains [Ronald et al, 2006a,b], the different developmental trajectories seen across domains [Charman et al, 2003[Charman et al, , 2005Lord and Pickles, 1996], and the apparent independent heritability of relevant traits [Ronald et al, 2005[Ronald et al, , 2006a.…”
Section: Accumulating Evidence For Fractionable Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%