2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3496484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Insurance Demand from Risk Attitudes

Abstract: Can measured risk attitudes and associated structural models predict insurance demand? In an experiment (n = 1,730), we elicit measures of utility curvature, probability weighting, loss aversion, and preference for certainty and use them to parameterize seventeen common structural models (e.g., expected utility, cumulative prospect theory). Subjects also make twelve insurance choices over different loss probabilities and prices. The insurance choices show coherence and some correlation with various risk-attitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference can result from different preferences to UBI but could also be reflection of different willingness to getting insurance in general. For example Jaspersen et al (2022) found positive correlation between different measures of risk aversion (utility curvature, loss aversion, probability weighting) and insurance demand.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference can result from different preferences to UBI but could also be reflection of different willingness to getting insurance in general. For example Jaspersen et al (2022) found positive correlation between different measures of risk aversion (utility curvature, loss aversion, probability weighting) and insurance demand.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could argue that such lottery decisions measure a preference for certainty instead of utility curvature. However, recent research on comparable lotteries shows no difference in behavior when certain payments are the safe option in multiple price lists rather than less risky lotteries (Jaspersen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Setting and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Willingness to pay for insurance then depends on the precise shape of both the distribution of losses and the weighting function (Baillon et al, 2022b). 5 See Jaspersen et al (2022) for alternatives. 6 This is because the weight placed on the probability of the loss rises, w p p ( ) > , while the weight attached to the prospect of paying the insurance premium is the same as that given under EU, w (1) = 1.…”
Section: The Variance Of Consumption With Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospect theory (PT) model of insurance in which the premium is perceived as a loss predicts that convex utility over losses will drive demand down (Wakker et al, 1997). Any motivation to insure would then have to come from the distorted transformation of loss probabilities into decision weights (Barseghyan et al, 2013; Jaspersen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation