Predicting Inpatient Aggression in Forensic Services Using Remote Monitoring Technology: Qualitative Study of Staff Perspectives

Abstract

BackgroundMonitoring risk of imminent aggression in inpatient forensic mental health services could be supported by passive remote monitoring technology, but staff attitudes toward the relevance and likelihood of engagement with this technology are unknown.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore staff views, specifically potential benefits and implementation barriers, on using this technology for monitoring risk of inpatient aggression.MethodsWe conducted semistructured focus groups with nurses in an inpatient forensic mental health service. We used thematic analysis with two independent raters to identify themes and subthemes related to staff attitudes toward passive remote monitoring. We subsequently checked with members to ensure the validity of the themes identified by the raters.ResultsFrom January to March 2019, a total of 25 nurses took part in five focus groups. We identified five main themes, one of which concerned the potential benefits that passive remote monitoring could provide for monitoring risk of aggression. Staff suggested it could provide an early warning of impending aggression and enable support to be provided earlier. The remaining themes concerned implementation barriers, including risks to the users’ physical and mental well-being; data security concerns and potential access by third parties; the negative impact of a constant stream of real-time data on staff workload; and design characteristics and user awareness of the benefits of passive remote monitoring.ConclusionsPassive remote monitoring technology could support existing methods of monitoring inpatient aggression risk, but multiple barriers to implementation exist. Empirical research is required to investigate whether these potential benefits can be realized, and to identify ways of addressing these barriers to ensure acceptability and user engagement.

Heart rate and skin conductance associations with physical aggression, psychopathy, antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder: An updated meta-analysis

“…The multilevel models used by Looff et al (2019) showed that HR and SC levels rose significantly in the 20-minute period immediately preceding aggressive behavior. This may potentially provide further opportunities to both design and implement interventions that precede imminent aggressive and violent behavior, which are either aimed at cueing staff members of imminent aggression (Goodwin et al, 2019;Greer et al, 2019) or providing a person displaying AB with real-time information of the bodily signals that precede aggressive behavior (Derks et al, 2019). Overall, based on the current results, it is worthwhile to explore unobtrusive ANS measures as additional risk assessment tools.…”

How to make study documents clear and relevant: the impact of patient involvement

“…All study documents were related to mental health research and consisted of a variety of study types and fields, such as clinical trials, cross-sectional investigations and qualitative studies (e.g. Martland et al, 16 Greer at al 17 ). This was supplemented by a detailed qualitative analysis of patient/carer FAST-R member reviews found on the feedback forms and on the documents themselves.…”

Utilization and effects of security technologies in mental health: A scoping review

“…Actually, some of the included studies raised ethical objections related to the use of these security measures (Nolan & Volavka, 2006; Stolovy et al, 2015; Tully et al, 2015), according to literature (Appenzeller et al, 2020). Moreover, the implementation of some technologies could lead to concerns about the violation of privacy or limitation of freedom (Greer et al, 2019; Morris, 2021; Simpson, 2022) and the legal system of some countries may not allow their use in healthcare. Furthermore, the cost of introducing some measures, as in the case of PAs which cost $160.000 (Emmerson et al, 2007), may not be affordable in all countries or hospitals.…”