2022
DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting hypertension onset from longitudinal electronic health records with deep learning

Abstract: Objective Hypertension has long been recognized as one of the most important predisposing factors for cardiovascular diseases and mortality. In recent years, machine learning methods have shown potential in diagnostic and predictive approaches in chronic diseases. Electronic health records (EHRs) have emerged as a reliable source of longitudinal data. The aim of this study is to predict the onset of hypertension using modern deep learning (DL) architectures, specifically long short-term memor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study confirmed that SHAP analysis has the potential to improve the explainability of disease prediction models trained using embedded EHR data. In line with similar research (Datta et al, 2022 ), our analysis found a combination of established disease predictors and novel features identified by the model. For example, our COPD predictors included tobacco dependence and expected comorbidities (e.g., hypertension) but also features such as chest x-rays which may correlate with likelihood of a COPD diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study confirmed that SHAP analysis has the potential to improve the explainability of disease prediction models trained using embedded EHR data. In line with similar research (Datta et al, 2022 ), our analysis found a combination of established disease predictors and novel features identified by the model. For example, our COPD predictors included tobacco dependence and expected comorbidities (e.g., hypertension) but also features such as chest x-rays which may correlate with likelihood of a COPD diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Hi-BEHRT authors included type 1 diabetes in their cohort and used a 5 year prediction window (Li et al, 2022 ). The ROC AUC for predicting the 3-year risk of hypertension (0.92) is comparable to that achieved by Datta et al ( 2022 ) predicting 2-year risk of hypertension with a similar model architecture (0.90). Further research would be required to systematically evaluate the relative performance of our approach to others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The top eight most used variables in the literature were the same used in the Framingham risk model [ 18 ]. Note, in five studies applying ML methods, complete information about the variables used in final models was not presented [ 45 , 48 , 50 , 53 , 70 ]. A summarized view of predictors used in studies can be seen in Fig 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that reporting should be even more rigorous. As an example of the opposite, in three studies [ 50 , 53 , 70 ] developing risk models using EHRs, a complete list of variables used in the final models was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have used EHRs and machine learning methods to predict risks in a variety of health care settings, including risk of hospital readmissions after stroke, 27 development of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in patients with HF, 28 hospitalization in children with complex health needs, 29 and personalized breast cancer prediction. 30 In the field of cardiovascular medicine, recent studies have used EHR‐based models to predict the risk of developing vascular complications in patients with prediabetes or diabetes, 31 developing hypertension, 32 , 33 and occurrence of stroke in patients with hypertension. 34 Similar studies that developed predictive risk models using insurance claims data have investigated risks for adverse cardiovascular and chronic renal outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%