2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting HLA-DPB1 permissive probabilities through a DPB1 prediction service towards the optimization of HCT donor selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While DPB1 epitope status is provided when donors are high resolution typed for DPB1, there are no probabilistic estimates to guide their search when the typing is missing or ambiguous. Therefore, confirmatory typing at the DPB1 typing locus had not been informed by immunogenetics reference data until 2021 when NMDP released a prototype tool for DPB1 match predictions 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While DPB1 epitope status is provided when donors are high resolution typed for DPB1, there are no probabilistic estimates to guide their search when the typing is missing or ambiguous. Therefore, confirmatory typing at the DPB1 typing locus had not been informed by immunogenetics reference data until 2021 when NMDP released a prototype tool for DPB1 match predictions 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we present HLA match likelihoods for patients searching the US unrelated stem cell donor registry for a more optimal donor with A, B, C, DRB1 high resolution allele matching and TCE permissive mismatching at DPB1. We also sought to analyze linkage disequilibrium patterns between HLA loci to understand why DPB1 TCE categories are often highly predictable when the other HLA loci are typed 19 . We hypothesized that if tools for prioritizing donors for additional typing based on likelihood of match at DPB1 were available, better results could be achieved with reduced time and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%