Predicting global habitat suitability for stony corals on seamounts

Abstract

Aim Globally, species distribution patterns in the deep sea are poorly resolved, with spatial coverage being sparse for most taxa and true absence data missing. Increasing human impacts on deep-sea ecosystems mean that reaching a better understanding of such patterns is becoming more urgent. Cold-water stony corals (Order Scleractinia) form structurally complex habitats (dense thickets or reefs) that can support a diversity of other associated fauna. Despite their widely accepted ecological importance, records of scleractinian corals on seamounts are patchy and simply not available for most of the global ocean. The objective of this paper is to model the global distribution of suitable habitat for stony corals on seamounts.Location Seamounts worldwide.Methods We compiled a database containing all accessible records of scleractinian corals on seamounts. Two modelling approaches developed for presence-only data were used to predict global habitat suitability for seamount scleractinians: maximum entropy modelling (Maxent) and environmental niche factor analysis (ENFA). We generated habitat-suitability maps and used a crossvalidation process with a threshold-independent metric to evaluate the performance of the models.Results Both models performed well in cross-validation, although the Maxent method consistently outperformed ENFA. Highly suitable habitat for seamount stony corals was predicted to occur at most modelled depths in the North Atlantic, and in a circumglobal strip in the Southern Hemisphere between 20°and 50°S and shallower than around 1500 m. Seamount summits in most other regions appeared much less likely to provide suitable habitat, except for small near-surface patches. The patterns of habitat suitability largely reflect current biogeographical knowledge. Environmental variables positively associated with high predicted habitat suitability included the aragonite saturation state, and oxygen saturation and concentration. By contrast, low levels of dissolved inorganic carbon, nitrate, phosphate and silicate were associated with high predicted suitability. High correlation among variables made assessing individual drivers difficult.Main conclusions Our models predict environmental conditions likely to play a role in determining large-scale scleractinian coral distributions on seamounts, and provide a baseline scenario on a global scale. These results present a firstorder hypothesis that can be tested by further sampling. Given the high vulnerability of cold-water corals to human impacts, such predictions are crucial tools in developing worldwide conservation and management strategies for seamount ecosystems.

Coralligenous and maërl habitats: predictive modelling to identify their spatial distributions across the Mediterranean Sea

“…water temperature, salinity, depth, nutrient concentrations, seabed types, etc), which are typically easier to record and map across vast expanses (i.e. regional, global scale) in contrast to species and habitat data [42][43][44] . Despite inherent limitations and associated uncertainties, predictive modelling is a cost-effective alternative to field surveys as it can help identifying and mapping where sensitive marine ecosystems may occur.…”

A Census of Fishes and Everything They Eat: How the Census of Marine Life Advanced Fisheries Science

“…Seamounts have become a target for fisheries worldwide, and researchers created the first integrated public database of global seamount biological data (Seamounts Online 2012). They compiled available data, new surveys, and the latest modeling methods in the first global seamount classification identifying regions most vulnerable to fishing and climate change (Tittensor et al 2009;Clark et al 2011). Their data showed that seamount communities are vulnerable to fishing and that these communities, particularly those with hard corals, have high sensitivity and low resilience to bottom trawling.…”

Climate-induced range shifts of the American jackknife clam Ensis directus in Europe

“…The AUC method was first developed for the evaluation of presence-absence models. Afterwards, this test has been adapted to evaluate the models based on presence-only data by replacing absences with pseudo-absences in the background locations (the grid cells without species presence) (Wiley et al 2003;Philips et al 2006;Tittensor et al 2009). The application of the adapted AUC method on presenceonly data models has been debated (Lobo et al 2008;Hernandez et al 2006) but with the lack of other valuable alternatives, AUC remains the most used procedure (Merow et al 2013).…”

“…The AUC is a threshold independent measure that allows an assessment of the model performance by given a value ranged between 0 and 1 (0.5 for a random model and 1 for a perfect one). We used a cross-validation procedure, as recommended by (Merow et al 2013) and performed by (Tittensor et al 2009) by selecting 70 % of data to run the model NPPEN and 30 % to evaluate its performance. The AUC method was first developed for the evaluation of presence-absence models.…”