2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting future intentions of basketball spectators using SEM and fsQCA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The items are answered on a Likert scale with five response anchors ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree , as for the other two scales used in this study. The scale has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in previous studies[58–59], and adequate psychometric properties were also observed in the present study without any re-specification: χ2(df) = 96.43(34); SB-χ2(df) = 77.07(34); χ2/df = 2.83; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .063 (IC = .044-.081). In the present study, a reliability of .71 (CI = .66-.76) was obtained for social dominance, and a reliability of .66 (CI = .60-.71) was obtained for opposition to equality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The items are answered on a Likert scale with five response anchors ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree , as for the other two scales used in this study. The scale has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in previous studies[58–59], and adequate psychometric properties were also observed in the present study without any re-specification: χ2(df) = 96.43(34); SB-χ2(df) = 77.07(34); χ2/df = 2.83; CFI = .92; IFI = .92; RMSEA = .063 (IC = .044-.081). In the present study, a reliability of .71 (CI = .66-.76) was obtained for social dominance, and a reliability of .66 (CI = .60-.71) was obtained for opposition to equality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QCA is an analytical technique that allows in-depth analysis of how a series of causal conditions contribute to a particular result[56–58]. QCA models are based on Boolean logic, and the results depend to a large extent on combinations of attributes rather than on the individual contribution of each attribute[59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are focused on the individual prediction and do not consider the possibility of different pathways that would lead to the same result [50,51]. In contrast, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is a methodology that allows a more in-depth analysis of how a set of causal conditions contribute to a hypothesised outcome [52,53]. QCA is based on the assumption that such outcome depends on a combination of different factors rather than on individual levels of those factors [54,55].…”
Section: Rationale For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all of the above, it is clear that there are many studies that relate service quality, value, satisfaction, and the future intentions of sport consumers, but this research largely focuses on the professional level of sport and on spectators (e.g. Calabuig, Prado-Gasc o, Crespo, N uñez-Pomar & Añ o, 2016;Clemes et al, 2011;Yoshida & James, 2010). However, a few very recent studies have analysed the perceptions of athletes participating in sporting events (e.g.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%