1986
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1986.10885721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting First-Grade Students’ Writing Achievement Using the Canadian Readiness Test and Selected Measures of Cognitive Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficients ranged from .78 to .95 far the six subscales. In a pilot study, it was established that the CRT serves as an effective predictor of the reading and writing achievement variables used in the WTR evaluation for Grade 1 children[9]. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficients ranged from .78 to .95 far the six subscales. In a pilot study, it was established that the CRT serves as an effective predictor of the reading and writing achievement variables used in the WTR evaluation for Grade 1 children[9]. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless research can take these measures beyond such traditional predictions, we probably should abandon them and retain traditional reading readiness tests whose creators have been tuning their psychometric properties for decades. Recently, for example, in a parallel study of writing, Ollila, Colis, and Yore (1986) found that a rather traditional sounding readiness test was a better predictor of writing ability than was a cognitive battery. However, if we are to move beyond some 50 years of predictive research, we must study the validity of underlying constructs such as those of metalinguistic awareness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%