2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2310621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Financial Markets with Google Trends and Not so Random Keywords

Abstract: We discuss the claims that data from Google Trends contain enough information to predict future financial index returns. We first review the many subtle (and less subtle) biases that may affect the backtest of a trading strategy, particularly when based on such data. Expectedly, the choice of keywords is crucial: by using an industry-grade backtest system, we verify that random financerelated keywords do not to contain more exploitable predictive information than random keywords related to illnesses, classic c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate Δ Tweet volume against Δ Price (the hourly returns) for each financial-instrument/Twitter-Filter combination to evaluate the extent to which hourly changes in Tweet volumes can lead the securities' hourly returns using our methodology as an echo of past studies which compare social media89 and search engine10111213 message volumes with financial market performance. We then also repeat this experiment to consider Δ Tweet volume against |Δ Price | (the absolute hourly returns) to further explore the ability of hourly changes in Tweet volumes to lead securities' hourly returns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluate Δ Tweet volume against Δ Price (the hourly returns) for each financial-instrument/Twitter-Filter combination to evaluate the extent to which hourly changes in Tweet volumes can lead the securities' hourly returns using our methodology as an echo of past studies which compare social media89 and search engine10111213 message volumes with financial market performance. We then also repeat this experiment to consider Δ Tweet volume against |Δ Price | (the absolute hourly returns) to further explore the ability of hourly changes in Tweet volumes to lead securities' hourly returns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform our analysis on hourly changes in Tweet sentiments vs. the hourly returns of forty-four financial instruments, showing that Twitter sentiment leads securities' returns in a statistically-significant manner for twelve instruments. We then perform identical analyses on the hourly changes in Twitter message volumes vs. the hourly returns and the absolute hourly returns of the same forty-four financial instruments, to echo recent studies which compare social media89 and search engine10111213 message volumes with financial market performance. We demonstrate that the Tweet sentiments result in proportionally larger maximum information surplus values compared to the maximum information surplus values seen from our Tweet volume (rather than Tweet sentiment ) experiments.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a new maximum is found in the dataset, it changes all the previous values of normalized search frequency. Unfortunately, this is a permanent problem when working with this dataset and it may jeopardize the reproducibility of the research (Challet and Ayed, ). We expect, however, that given the scale of our research, our main results are not be biased by this property.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%