2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.01765
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Factuality of Reporting and Bias of News Media Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We scraped the RSS feeds of each news source twice a day starting on 02/02/2018 using the Python libraries feedparser and goose. For source selection, we start with mainstream outlets (from both the U.S. and the U.K.) and alternative sources that are mentioned in other misinformation studies (Starbird 2017;Baly et al 2018). We then use the Google Search API to expand the number of sources in the collection.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We scraped the RSS feeds of each news source twice a day starting on 02/02/2018 using the Python libraries feedparser and goose. For source selection, we start with mainstream outlets (from both the U.S. and the U.K.) and alternative sources that are mentioned in other misinformation studies (Starbird 2017;Baly et al 2018). We then use the Google Search API to expand the number of sources in the collection.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rise in low-quality and potentially malicious news producers has been the focus of many recent studies such as those focusing on detecting false content (Potthast et al 2017;Popat et al 2016;Singhania, Fernandez, and Rao 2017;Baly et al 2018). Some other studies have focused on the tactics used to spread low-quality news, such as the use of social bots (Shao et al 2017) and the structures of headlines to get higher attention and clicks (Horne and Adalı 2017;Chakraborty et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to investigate news images, Jin et al [14] defined a set of visual features to predict fake news within a traditional statistical learning framework, and Wang et al [32] employed a deep neural network (VGG-19) to help extract the latent representation of news images. Baly et al [1] characterized fake news articles by their source websites, e.g., if they have a Wikipedia page, if their URLs contain digits or domain extensions such as .co, .com, .gov, and their Web traffic information. Nevertheless, few research efforts have focused on the authors who create and write the [true or fake] news, which we investigate in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier research has focused on assessing source credibility by looking at the URL associated with any news article [1], including features such as whether a website contains the https prefix, numbers, or .gov, .co, .com domain extensions. In our data, 354 news articles used the http prefix, 15 used the https prefix, and 37 had no URL.…”
Section: Source Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mihalcea and Strapparvva used tokenization and stemming for preprocessing the data and applied Naıve Bayes algorithm and Support Vector Machine (SVM) for the classification. In recent research the linguistic style [29], [2], [26] and source of the text are considered as the most critical factors to decide the genuineness of a fact or claim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%