2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1115-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting essential proteins based on subcellular localization, orthology and PPI networks

Abstract: BackgroundEssential proteins play an indispensable role in the cellular survival and development. There have been a series of biological experimental methods for finding essential proteins; however they are time-consuming, expensive and inefficient. In order to overcome the shortcomings of biological experimental methods, many computational methods have been proposed to predict essential proteins. The computational methods can be roughly divided into two categories, the topology-based methods and the sequence-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gives the results. From table4 we can see that DeepHE (N+S) significantly outperforms the other machine learning models regarding to three comprehensive measures, AUC, AP, and Accuracy. For instance, the AUC score of DeepHE (N+S) is 8.79% higher than that of SVM (N+S), 43.22% higher than that of NB (N+S), 25.38% higher than that of RF (N+S), and 15.39% higher than that of Adaboost (N+S).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…gives the results. From table4 we can see that DeepHE (N+S) significantly outperforms the other machine learning models regarding to three comprehensive measures, AUC, AP, and Accuracy. For instance, the AUC score of DeepHE (N+S) is 8.79% higher than that of SVM (N+S), 43.22% higher than that of NB (N+S), 25.38% higher than that of RF (N+S), and 15.39% higher than that of Adaboost (N+S).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…CoTB exhibited the best performance and obtained prediction precisions of 89, 78, 79, and 85 percent on the YDIP, YMIPS, YMBD and YHQ datasets at the top 100 level, respectively. In particular, compared to the most recently developed method, SON [ 23 ], CoTB improved the prediction precisions by at least 9, 10, 8, 8, 7, and 8 percent on the YDIP dataset at the top 100 to top 600 levels, respectively. Compared to GOS [ 24 ], CoTB improved the prediction precisions by at least 6, 6, 9, and 10 percent on the YDIP dataset at the top 300 to top 600 levels, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been proven that orthologous properties are positively correlated with protein essentiality [ 22 ]. Li [ 23 ] proposed a method named SON that integrates subcellular localization and orthologous score (OS) information, and this method improved the accuracy of predicting essential proteins to approximately 81 percent on the YDIP dataset at the top 100 level. Li [ 24 ] proposed a method named GOS that integrates gene expression, orthology, and subcellular localization information to identify essential proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subcellular localization diversity of the protein products of a gene may serve as an important characteristic in revealing gene essentiality, in the context of subcellular locations. Previous studies have discussed the protein localization specificity in prokaryotes (Peng and Gao, 2014), and integrated the subcellular localized information with PPI topology for predicting essential genes (Acencio and Lemke, 2009;Li et al, 2016;Li et al, 2018), using annotation data from the Gene Ontology-Cellular Component Ontology (GO-CCO) (Ashburner et al, 2000). Although the priority of these components definitely needs to be discussed, another potentially important characteristic of protein localization seems to be ignored, which is the subcellular diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%