2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc02362d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting enzymatic reactions with a molecular transformer

Abstract: The use of enzymes for organic synthesis allows for simplified, more economical and selective synthetic routes not accessible to conventional reagents. However, predicting whether a particular molecule might undergo a...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicitly, we thus assume that conserved substructures indicate the importance of the respective structures to the mechanism of the reaction or to specific interactions with amino acids in the active pocket of the enzyme. Enzymes usually react only with certain types of substrates, whereas chemical reagents are typically only specific to a functional group, 44 so that inferring information about important substructures in known substrates is especially relevant for biocatalytic transformations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicitly, we thus assume that conserved substructures indicate the importance of the respective structures to the mechanism of the reaction or to specific interactions with amino acids in the active pocket of the enzyme. Enzymes usually react only with certain types of substrates, whereas chemical reagents are typically only specific to a functional group, 44 so that inferring information about important substructures in known substrates is especially relevant for biocatalytic transformations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As intimated above, the exponential increase in computer power will eventually allow the methods of molecular dynamics to admit these "measurements" entirely by calculations based on simple force fields, de novo. In addition, given the success of so-called deep learning [628][629][630] methods in predicting the structures of proteins [631][632][633][634][635][636][637][638][639][640][641][642][643][644][645], novel receptor-ligand interactions [646][647][648][649][650], and a variety of other protein and small molecule properties (e.g., [201,[651][652][653][654][655][656][657][658][659][660][661][662][663][664][665]), it seems likely that we shall soon have available in silico methods for predicting transporter substrates directly from protein sequences, and the likeliest transporters from candidate substrate structures of interest.…”
Section: Looking To the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML methods have been coupled with chemoinformatic molecular descriptors [106] and structure-based reactivity estimation approaches to predict reaction outcomes [107,108]. Deep learning, which is a subset of ML, has been used in chemical reaction prediction [109] and to predict reaction yields [110] using interfaces like IBM RXN for Chemistry [111,112], which can be further modified to predict enzymatic reactions [113], and being open-source, these approaches can be readily modified to meet user requirements. Meuwly [114] reviewed the utility of ML methods for chemical reactions.…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learning (Ml) For Understanding Crnsmentioning
confidence: 99%