2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2708-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting enhancers in mammalian genomes using supervised hidden Markov models

Abstract: Background Eukaryotic gene regulation is a complex process comprising the dynamic interaction of enhancers and promoters in order to activate gene expression. In recent years, research in regulatory genomics has contributed to a better understanding of the characteristics of promoter elements and for most sequenced model organism genomes there exist comprehensive and reliable promoter annotations. For enhancers, however, a reliable description of their characteristics and location has so far prove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyst may downsample 1-bp resolution signal into bins (see “Spatial resolution”). This involves computing one of: ● average read count, ● reads per million mapped reads fold enrichment [ 47 ], ● total count of reads [ 19 , 48 , 49 ], or ● maximum count of reads of each bin [ 9 , 21 ]. Binning greatly decreases the computational cost of the SAGA algorithm and can improve the data’s statistical properties.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyst may downsample 1-bp resolution signal into bins (see “Spatial resolution”). This involves computing one of: ● average read count, ● reads per million mapped reads fold enrichment [ 47 ], ● total count of reads [ 19 , 48 , 49 ], or ● maximum count of reads of each bin [ 9 , 21 ]. Binning greatly decreases the computational cost of the SAGA algorithm and can improve the data’s statistical properties.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HMM method predicted a higher number of TSS compared to profile-based approach, and its predictions were supported by other marks such as CAGE tags, P300, and DHSs. Furthermore, several popular HMM and their generalized form, dynamic Bayesian networks (DBN)-based mathematical models, have been developed for genome-wide enhancer prediction using either supervised (such as CHROMatin-based Integrated Approach (Chromia) [ 168 ] and enhancer-HMM [ 169 ]) or unsupervised (such as ChromHMM [ 170 ], Genostan [ 171 ], and Segway [ 172 ]) learning algorithms. The ENCODE project consortium [ 173 ] implemented an unsupervised machine learning method to annotate functionally relevant regions across 1640 genomics datasets in 147 distinct human cell-types, generated under this project.…”
Section: Technological Advances In Enhancer Discovery Provides Future Opportunities For Identification Of Cardiac Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a few more computational methods have been developed with additional applications and/or advantages. For example, a supervised hidden Markov model (HMM) based method, enhancer HMM (eHMM), have been developed that can distinguish between enhancers and promoters too, despite a substantial overlap between their features (Zehnder et al 2019). In addition, methods for identification and classification of enhancers via dimension reduction technology and/or recurrent/ convolutional neural networks have been proposed (Li et al 2020a(Li et al , 2020b(Li et al , 2020cNguyen et al 2019).…”
Section: Computational Approaches For Enhancer Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%