2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2220-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting drug-disease associations by using similarity constrained matrix factorization

Abstract: BackgroundDrug-disease associations provide important information for the drug discovery. Wet experiments that identify drug-disease associations are time-consuming and expensive. However, many drug-disease associations are still unobserved or unknown. The development of computational methods for predicting unobserved drug-disease associations is an important and urgent task.ResultsIn this paper, we proposed a similarity constrained matrix factorization method for the drug-disease association prediction (SCMFD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our proposed method is the first to generate drug combinations for specific diseases, we consider the following baseline methods to compare with: 1) random selection of 1,000 pairs from 8,724 small-molecule drugs in Drugbank (Wishart et al, 2018); 2) 628 FDA-approved drug combinations curated by (Cheng et al, 2019) for hypertension and cancers (our case studies are on 4 types of cancers); 3) random selection of 1,000 pairs of FDA-approved drugs for the given disease, based on drug-disease dataset "SCMFDD-L" (Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Baseline Methods For Drug Pair Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our proposed method is the first to generate drug combinations for specific diseases, we consider the following baseline methods to compare with: 1) random selection of 1,000 pairs from 8,724 small-molecule drugs in Drugbank (Wishart et al, 2018); 2) 628 FDA-approved drug combinations curated by (Cheng et al, 2019) for hypertension and cancers (our case studies are on 4 types of cancers); 3) random selection of 1,000 pairs of FDA-approved drugs for the given disease, based on drug-disease dataset "SCMFDD-L" (Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Baseline Methods For Drug Pair Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After standardizing the identifiers via the Correspondence Table and STRING database, we got of 7,739 different drugs and 4,975 different proteins. In order to avoid sparsity of associations, we selected drugs and proteins that are associated with more than 5 corresponding objects similar to the article described by Zhang et al (Zhang, et al, 2018). Finally, we obtained 7,318 experimental valid drug-target interactions containing 641 different drugs and 317 different proteins.…”
Section: Known Drug-target Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case study of Ataxia was implemented to assess the performance of the proposed method in a real-world environment. As mentioned above, we have collected 17414 drugdisease associations from CTD database [45] and processed them as described in the article of Zhang et al [54]. In order to verify the predicted effect of the proposed model on new disease, we removed 61 association pairs related to Ataxia, the remaining 17353 drugdisease associations were utilized as the training set to generate feature and construct the model, and each drug is connected to Ataxia in turn to form the test set.…”
Section: A Case Study Based On Drug-disease Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%