2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40479-016-0043-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting dropout in outpatient dialectical behavior therapy with patients with borderline personality disorder receiving psychiatric disability

Abstract: BackgroundRates of treatment dropout in outpatient Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) in the community can be as high as 24 % to 58 %, making dropout a great concern. The primary purpose of this article was to examine predictors of dropout from DBT in a community mental health setting.MethodsParticipants were 56 consumers with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who were psychiatrically disabled participating in a larger feasibility trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy- Accepting the Challenges of Exiting t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
32
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
32
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Strengths of the present research included the high consent and follow-up rates and recruitment of participants from multiple different services implementing DBT and MBT in a real-world setting, thus increasing the external validity of the findings. Drop-out rates from both treatment modalities, and in particular from DBT, were high, but in keeping with trials of MBT conducted by the treatment developers (Bateman & Fonagy, 1999 and with studies in which DBT was implemented in routine community services (Feigenbaum et al, 2012;Landes, Chalker, & Comtois, 2016;Priebe et al, 2012). Additionally, participants were followed up after treatment dropout, with intention-to-treat analysis used to ensure that treatment dropouts were well represented in the dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Strengths of the present research included the high consent and follow-up rates and recruitment of participants from multiple different services implementing DBT and MBT in a real-world setting, thus increasing the external validity of the findings. Drop-out rates from both treatment modalities, and in particular from DBT, were high, but in keeping with trials of MBT conducted by the treatment developers (Bateman & Fonagy, 1999 and with studies in which DBT was implemented in routine community services (Feigenbaum et al, 2012;Landes, Chalker, & Comtois, 2016;Priebe et al, 2012). Additionally, participants were followed up after treatment dropout, with intention-to-treat analysis used to ensure that treatment dropouts were well represented in the dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Younger age has been associated with higher dropout rates [27, 29]. However, other studies did not find evidence for an influence of demographic factors [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found better outcomes on borderline symptom severity and general psychopathology among young adults (18-25 years) with BPD 2 Series of one way between-group analyses of covariance comparing post-treatment scores on self-report measures among completers of young adult only DBT (n = 19) and similar aged young adult completers of general adult DBT (n = 11) after adjusting for baseline scores and prior hospitalization as covariates. Partial eta squared (η p 2 ) is used as a measure of effect size in both programmes (20.8% and 15.4%, respectively) was somewhat surprising since younger age has previously been associated with higher dropout for adults in DBT (Landes, Chalker, & Comtois, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%