2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59065-9_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Customer Churn for Insurance Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Customer churn prediction modeling has often been the focus of researchers, as evidenced by numerous studies published on this topic. Particularly well-explored are the contractual business settings in the B2C domain, such as those commonly encountered in the telecommunications [19][20][21], banking [22,23], and insurance [24,25] sectors, where customers at risk of terminating or not renewing their contracts are identified and targeted with retention campaigns in efforts to persuade them otherwise. Non-contractual settings have also often been studied, where efforts have been put towards predicting which retail customers are least likely to make a purchase in the future [26,27], which users are at most risk to stop playing mobile games [6], or which passengers are not planning to use a particular airline for their future flights [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer churn prediction modeling has often been the focus of researchers, as evidenced by numerous studies published on this topic. Particularly well-explored are the contractual business settings in the B2C domain, such as those commonly encountered in the telecommunications [19][20][21], banking [22,23], and insurance [24,25] sectors, where customers at risk of terminating or not renewing their contracts are identified and targeted with retention campaigns in efforts to persuade them otherwise. Non-contractual settings have also often been studied, where efforts have been put towards predicting which retail customers are least likely to make a purchase in the future [26,27], which users are at most risk to stop playing mobile games [6], or which passengers are not planning to use a particular airline for their future flights [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods were fitted to LGPIF data from years 2006 to 2012, and out-ofsample validation was performed on data in year 2013. In terms of assessing performance, a widely used evaluation metric in traditional customer churn analysis is error rate = (1 − accuracy), which is defined as the percentage of incorrectly classified observations in the test set (see for example Bolancé et al, 2016;Loisel et al, 2019;Scriney et al, 2020). However, a major disadvantage of error rate is that it is not well suited to imbalanced data with rare events (with imbalanced classes, it is easy to get a low error rate without actually making useful predictions, Morrison, 1969), and this is the case here with the LGPIF data, as exemplified in Table 1.…”
Section: Assessing Out-of-sample Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ensured the numbers of transitions with different states of destination (full-coverage, partial-coverage, and churn) were equal by adding additional samples to the minority transitions with replacement. In contrast to oversampling, undersampling is also widely used in customer churn analysis when a data set includes a large number of records; see Scriney et al (2020). However, as discussed in Section 4, the LGPIF data do not contain enough time points or observations for this to be relevant.…”
Section: Aucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this reflects a real and common problem for organizations, the two most popular variables for CLV calculations were missing: acquisition and retention. Thus, the imputation of these values is part of our future research and will be published in Scriney et al (2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%