2017 10th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iscid.2017.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Countermovement Jump Heights by Time Domain, Frequency Domain, and Machine Learning Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the different data were created using different sport branches, sexes, and physical properties, similar results were obtained via linear regression with the same exercise protocol. The R 2 score of the CMJF was 0.70 in this study, and 0.689 was achieved by Zhou et al [25]. However, the RBFNN achieved an R 2 score of 0.96 in the same experiment.…”
Section: B Determination Of Factorssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even if the different data were created using different sport branches, sexes, and physical properties, similar results were obtained via linear regression with the same exercise protocol. The R 2 score of the CMJF was 0.70 in this study, and 0.689 was achieved by Zhou et al [25]. However, the RBFNN achieved an R 2 score of 0.96 in the same experiment.…”
Section: B Determination Of Factorssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The mean absolute error was used as an evaluation criterion, and it was concluded that the ANN was superior for minimizing error. The most similar study to the present study, which used countermovement jump experiments, was performed by Zhou et al [25] to predict the heights of countermovement jumps with free hands in football players. The comparison was performed among linear regression, decision tree and random forest models.…”
Section: B Determination Of Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation