2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting core level binding energies shifts: Suitability of the projector augmented wave approach as implemented in VASP

Abstract: Here, we assess the accuracy of various approaches implemented in Vienna ab initio simulation package code to estimate core‐level binding energy shifts (ΔBEs) using a projector augmented wave method to treat core electrons. The performance of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) and the Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–Scuseria (TPSS) exchange‐correlation density functionals is examined on a dataset of 68 molecules containing B→F atoms in diverse chemical environments, accounting for 185 different 1s core level binding energ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common approaches are the ∆SCF method where the core-electron binding energy is calculated as the total energy difference between the ground state and the final state with a core hole, [15] and the related Slater-Janak transition state method [16,17]. These techniques yield relative core-electron binding energies, or binding energy shifts, that are in good agreement with experimental measurements for free molecules * j.lischner@imperial.ac.uk [18][19][20][21][22][23]. While calculated binding energy shifts are often very useful for the interpretation of XPS spectra, their use requires the existence of well-defined core-level reference energies which is not always guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The most common approaches are the ∆SCF method where the core-electron binding energy is calculated as the total energy difference between the ground state and the final state with a core hole, [15] and the related Slater-Janak transition state method [16,17]. These techniques yield relative core-electron binding energies, or binding energy shifts, that are in good agreement with experimental measurements for free molecules * j.lischner@imperial.ac.uk [18][19][20][21][22][23]. While calculated binding energy shifts are often very useful for the interpretation of XPS spectra, their use requires the existence of well-defined core-level reference energies which is not always guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using the eigenvalues G m of G to compute the trace in Equation (38) and using Equations (4) and (37) yields Sum up: Figure 2: Pseudocode for the CD-G 0 W 0 method. Displayed is the computation of the QP energy G 0 W 0 n for state n.…”
Section: Spectral Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CD-G 0 W 0 method contains the convergence parameter η, see Equations (33)(34)(35)(36)(37). The self-energy is broadened with increasing η, which eventually affects the QP solutions.…”
Section: Broadening Parameter ηmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cation ordering within the pristine materials and the Li + arrangement within the delithiated structures of the layered oxide were generated following the methodology described by Seo et al 4 and using the Python Materials Genomics tool (pymatgen). 44 The core level binding energies (E CL ) of the O 1s electrons were evaluated with the initial state approximation [45][46][47][48][49][50] and shied with respect to a reference system (Li 2 MnO 3 (ref. 51)) into the experimentally observed energy region.…”
Section: Ab Initio Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%