Predicting Communication Delay and Energy Consumption for IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee Wireless Sensor Networks

Ouni, Sofiane; Ayoub, Zayneb Trabelsi

doi:10.5121/ijcnc.2013.5110

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Flood monitoring is a time-critical application; thus, the response time requirement must also be addressed by the FW application. Based on [56], we consider the response time as the time spent since a component requests for a device's service until this component receives the sensing data or the device performs the required actuation.…”

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the new applications are not time-restricted, we want to conceive the applications' architecture providing the minimum delay in the communication between components. Based on [56], we consider the response time as the time spent since a component requests a service to another component until this first component receives the respective answer. We will reuse the specification of availability and response time conceived for the FW application, which is introduced in Section 5.1.4.…”

Section: Figure 18 Requirements Of the New Applications Of Pscmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards the adoption of OMG standards in the development of SOA-based IoT systems

Costa

Pires

Delicato

2020

Journal of Systems and Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A common feature of the Internet of Things (IoT) is the high heterogeneity, regarding network protocols, data formats, hardware and software platforms. Aiming to deal with such a degree of heterogeneity, several frameworks have applied the Model-Driven Development (MDD) to build IoT applications. On the software architecture viewpoint, the literature has shown that the Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is a promising style to address the interoperability of entities composing these solutions. Some features of IoT make it challenging to analyze the impact of design decisions on the SOAbased IoT applications behavior. Thus, it is a key requirement to simulate the model to verify whether the system performs as expected before its implementation. Although the literature has identified that the SOA style is suitable for addressing the interoperability, existing modelling languages do not consider SOA elements as first-class citizens when designing IoT applications. Furthermore, although existing MDD frameworks provide modeling languages comprising well-defined syntax, they lack execution semantics, thus, are not suitable for model execution and analysis. This work aims at addressing these issues by introducing IoTDraw. The framework provides a fully OMG-compliant executable modeling language for SOA-based IoT systems; thus, its specifications can be implemented by any tool implementing OMG standards. Keywords-internet of things, application, model-driven development, service-oriented architecture given rise to the recent paradigm known as Sensor-Cloud or Cloud of Things, which aims to make the most of both technologies. IoT-generated data that requires a lot of processing or long-term storage can be sent to the cloud, which in turn extends its service portfolio to encompass sensing and actuation capabilities. Cloud platforms follow a service-based resource provisioning model. Cloud platforms providing infrastructure for IoT systems naturally adopt the services approach (e.g., [17], [18]). In a recent survey that investigated middleware technologies for Cloud of Things [19], the authors have identified that SOA is the main architectural style in CoT-based Middleware, due to is capability of promoting interoperability and reusability in IoT systems. 1.1 Issues in designing MDD & SOA-based IoT Systems Any DSL must provide a coherent set of concepts related to the domain of interest [8]. That is, the DSL must be expressive, aiming to allow the precise identification of multiple aspects regarding the application domain. Otherwise, if the DSL lacks essential elements of the underlying domain, the models may be at least ambiguous, or the modelers may not be able to represent all components of the applications. Although the literature has identified the suitability of the SOA style for addressing the interoperability in the IoT domain, to the best of our knowledge, there is no DSL tailored for the modeling of SOA-based IoT applications. SOA is a proven architectural pattern, with a well-known set of concepts. Existing DSLs ...

show abstract

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 18 Requirements Of the New Applications Of Pscmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards the adoption of OMG standards in the development of SOA-based IoT systems

Costa

Pires

Delicato

2020

Journal of Systems and Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4. Network lifetime [21]: The time duration between the network initialization and the moment at the death of first node due to battery exhaustion.…”

Section: Residual Energymentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Potent Shortcut Tree Routing in Zigbee Networks

Rajeshkanna¹,

Anitha²

2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZigBee is an international standard for low-power and low-data rate WPAN. ZigBee works on IEEE 802.15.4 MAC and physical layers. Its network layer is liable to facilitate routing in networks. To provide a near optimal routing path as well as to balance the load and energy over the nodes, Energy-efficient shortcut tree routing (ESTR) protocol suggested an optimization method with three criteria such as minimum hop-counts, minimum congestion and maximum link quality. This paper proposes an Energy potent shortcut tree routing (EPSTR) that adds one more criterion called minimum failure-transmissions with EPSTR’s criteria. The values for these criteria can be derived from the neighbor table data of a node. Performance evaluation reveals that EPSTR appreciably expands the network lifetime and shows better routing performances compared to ESTR.

show abstract

“…Several factors can influence the design of the routing protocols such as: Node Deployment, Power Consumption, Data Delivery Models, Node/link Heterogeneity, Fault Tolerance, Scalability, Network Dynamics, Transmission Media, Connectivity, Operating Environment, Data Aggregation/Fusion, Quality of Service (QoS), Production Costs, Data Latency and Overhead and Autonomy. Hence, is possible to see that routing protocols are needed to cope with the nature of wireless sensor networks and that proper routing in ad-hoc networks is the challenge to the designers [3,4]. This work objective to evaluate the feasibility of using Wireless Sensor Networks in a coffee crop through simulations using three classics routing protocols for ad hoc networks and two little variants:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Feasibility of Using Wireless Sensor Networks in a Coffee Crop Through Simulation of AODV, AOMDV, DSDV and Their Variants with 802.15.4 MAC Protocol

Cruz¹,

Gottardo²,

Rossini³

et al. 2014

IJCNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Predicting Communication Delay and Energy Consumption for IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 11 publications

References 15 publications

Towards the adoption of OMG standards in the development of SOA-based IoT systems

Towards the adoption of OMG standards in the development of SOA-based IoT systems

Energy Potent Shortcut Tree Routing in Zigbee Networks

Evaluating Feasibility of Using Wireless Sensor Networks in a Coffee Crop Through Simulation of AODV, AOMDV, DSDV and Their Variants with 802.15.4 MAC Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About