2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting chemical influence on soil water retention curves with models established based on pore structure evolution of compacted clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WRC displayed in Figure 1 shows the relationship between the GCL at varying water salinity conditions during the drying process while maintaining a constant volume. The WRC provides crucial insights into the GCL's function to retain water under different environmental conditions [4,13]. The results obtained from this study offer valuable observations.…”
Section: Wrc On the Drying Path Of Gclmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WRC displayed in Figure 1 shows the relationship between the GCL at varying water salinity conditions during the drying process while maintaining a constant volume. The WRC provides crucial insights into the GCL's function to retain water under different environmental conditions [4,13]. The results obtained from this study offer valuable observations.…”
Section: Wrc On the Drying Path Of Gclmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, it is imperative to assess the efficacy of the GCL as an anti-seepage barrier across various water content conditions. A comprehensive understanding of the water absorption and dehydration characteristics of GCLs with a constant volume is crucial for their long-term performance evaluation [13][14][15]. The water retention curve (WRC) describes the relationship between water content and suction in unsaturated soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the thickness of water films increased, clay particles separate from each other and the cohesiveness between them gradually reduced. Correspondingly, the clay structure underwent softening and degradation, and the clay minerals transferred from a tightly face-face arrangement to a loosely face-edge or even edge-edge one, leading to a reduction in mechanical strength (Zhang et al, 2016;Lu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Microstructural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 8, the surface of coral sand is rough and porous and rich in internal pores due to biological origin, and the gradual formation of new pores during sulfate ion erosion has a great impact on the strength of coral sand mortar. After adding GO, it has a good blocking effect on the formation of coral sand mortar erosion pores, to quantify the effect of 7 Geofluids GO on the evolution of pore parameters, the SEM images of coral mortar specimens magnified 100 times were binarized, and the microscopic pore parameters were calculated by Particles (Pores) and Cracks Analysis System (PCAS) [40][41][42] and 3 SEMs from each sample. In the complex environment of sulfate erosion, the pore area, pore number, porosity, and other parameters are insufficient to fully characterize the pore evolution law.…”
Section: Effect Of Go On Pore Characteristics During Sulfatementioning
confidence: 99%