2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting changes in the catchability coefficient through effort sorting as less skilled fishers exit the fishery during stock declines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study area we estimated the exploitation rate induced by anglers using fishery-independent data (underwater cameras) and a BACI design. Although exploitation rates could be directly estimated by mark and recapture studies observing tag returns of marked fishes by fishers39, estimating exploited biomass or abundance and associated reference points using fishery-dependent data notoriously difficult and costly40. In addition, conventional stock assessment approaches based on fishery-dependent data are prone to biases4142.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study area we estimated the exploitation rate induced by anglers using fishery-independent data (underwater cameras) and a BACI design. Although exploitation rates could be directly estimated by mark and recapture studies observing tag returns of marked fishes by fishers39, estimating exploited biomass or abundance and associated reference points using fishery-dependent data notoriously difficult and costly40. In addition, conventional stock assessment approaches based on fishery-dependent data are prone to biases4142.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trends at a boat level cannot be properly analyzed due to a confidentiality agreement, yet it will be very interesting to disentangle if the less efficient boats are those that are quitting the activity (fishers sorting). In this case, apparent stability of CPUE (landings per fishing trip) may mask a decrease in stock abundance (van Poorten et al, 2016). Alternatively, warning signs should not be deducted from stationary CPUE.…”
Section: Management Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is in practice a more challenging goal than expected. The approaches used in the past to identify métiers either (i) make use of existing records on the technical features of fishing trips (e.g., gear and mesh size used, fishing grounds visited, season, boat characteristics), which may be available from fishers' logbooks, (Marchal et al, 2006;Ulrich et al, 2001), or inferred from interviews with fishers (Christensen and Raakjaer, 2006;Neis et al, 1999), or (ii) are intended to ascertain the métiers used by retrospectively examining the landings (Deporte et al, 2012;Marchal, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, bag limits are often criticized because they lack precision in the ability to control harvest rates, even if the bag limit changes in response to population size (Andersen, 2015). In addition, concerns have been raised because the catchability coefficient seem to be inversely density dependent (Andersen and Kaltenborn, 2013;Eriksen et al, 2017) creating a risk that harvest rates become higher at low population densities (se e.g., from the fishery literature; Harley et al, 2001;Ward et al, 2013;van Poorten et al, 2016). It has been indicated that managers can achieve more control of offtake by allocating seasonal quotas to individual hunters or hunting teams (see e.g., Gibson et al, 2011), where the hunters/teams are allocated a given proportion of total area quota (see e.g., Kurki and Putaala, 2010).…”
Section: Limiting Total Allowable Catch (Tac)mentioning
confidence: 99%