2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Catalytic Activity of Nanoparticles by a DFT-Aided Machine-Learning Algorithm

Abstract: Catalytic activities are often dominated by a few specific surface sites, and designing active sites is the key to realize high-performance heterogeneous catalysts. The great triumphs of modern surface science lead to reproduce catalytic reaction rates by modeling the arrangement of surface atoms with well-defined single-crystal surfaces. However, this method has limitations in the case for highly inhomogeneous atomic configurations such as on alloy nanoparticles with atomic-scale defects, where the arrangemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
210
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
210
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gaussian kernel has been routinely applied in other kernel‐based methods, including Bayesian linear regression, support vector machine/regression/classification (SVM/SVR/SVC), kernel ridge regression (KRR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), etc. Kernel‐based models have been widely used in materials ML, for example, in constructing Gaussian approximation potential (GAP), predicting molecular properties, adsorption of gases on alloy nanoparticles, lithium conductivity in LISCON, thermal conductivity in solids, potential energy surfaces, etc.…”
Section: Model Selection and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gaussian kernel has been routinely applied in other kernel‐based methods, including Bayesian linear regression, support vector machine/regression/classification (SVM/SVR/SVC), kernel ridge regression (KRR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), etc. Kernel‐based models have been widely used in materials ML, for example, in constructing Gaussian approximation potential (GAP), predicting molecular properties, adsorption of gases on alloy nanoparticles, lithium conductivity in LISCON, thermal conductivity in solids, potential energy surfaces, etc.…”
Section: Model Selection and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) Activity map on atoms with different Au concentration. Adapted with permission . Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several successful examples have already been reported for organic chemistry reactions, including those that involve homogeneous catalysts . However, the applicability of ML predictions for heterogeneous catalysis have been limited mainly to computationally determined values such as band gaps, d‐band centers, and adsorption energies . For the practical use of ML for discovering new solid catalytic materials, not only first‐principles calculated values but also experimental values for specific catalytic reactions are needed, especially in heterogeneous catalysis because an adequate theoretical model for heterogeneous catalysis is not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be urgent and promising to optimize or develop machine learning algorithms that can efficiently train the data on a small database, especially when the amount of data is intrinsically small in nanomaterials domain. (3)Machine learning can enhance the existing theoretical computational approaches. The traditional quantum/molecular mechanics, such as density functional theory, molecular dynamics, and Monte Carlo techniques, have been combined with machine learning for materials research . Coupling with the high throughput computational screening method and evolutionary algorithms, machine learning approach is becoming a powerful tool to design synthesis method and predict complicated properties of nanomaterials, even discover new nanomaterials.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f) Density functional theory. Reproduced with permission . Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%