2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting cadmium concentration in soils using laboratory and field reflectance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, a sieve with a pore size of 2 mm was used to screen the crushed soil. Next, the sieved sample was compacted and screened again with a sieve with a pore size of 0.15 mm [27]. Finally, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and perchloric acid were used to decompose the arsenic in various forms in the soil sample, which converted them into soluble arsenic ions in the solution and avoided the interference of sulfur and phosphorus on the measurement.…”
Section: Soil Sample Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, a sieve with a pore size of 2 mm was used to screen the crushed soil. Next, the sieved sample was compacted and screened again with a sieve with a pore size of 0.15 mm [27]. Finally, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, and perchloric acid were used to decompose the arsenic in various forms in the soil sample, which converted them into soluble arsenic ions in the solution and avoided the interference of sulfur and phosphorus on the measurement.…”
Section: Soil Sample Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were taken from the upper soil layer (0-20 cm) in 2018. After removal of the stones and plant roots, then they were sifted through a 200-mesh sieve and then ground into fine particles, approximate particle size after grinding ≀74 ”m [32]. Each soil sample was then divided into two parts.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Soil Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the MTFA value of each band after the restoration was higher than that of the original tilting image, which showed that the quality of each band was better after restoration. To analyze the DN-value change of the restored tilting image, the index, the ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD) [ 30 ], which was commonly used in remote sensing inversion, was introduced in this study. The value can be expressed as follows: where SD means the standard deviation, RMSEP is the root mean square error of prediction and RPD was usually used to evaluate the predicted value in quantitative remote sensing restored image and the original image.…”
Section: Restoration Of Tilting Hyperspectral Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%