2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting breast cancer metastasis from whole-blood transcriptomic measurements

Abstract: Objective: In this exploratory work we investigate whether blood gene expression measurements predict breast cancer metastasis. Early detection of increased metastatic risk could potentially be life-saving. Our data comes from the Norwegian Women and Cancer epidemiological cohort study. The women who contributed to these data provided a blood sample up to a year before receiving a breast cancer diagnosis. We estimate a penalized maximum likelihood logistic regression. We evaluate this in terms of calibration, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We made some of these choices for convenience, such as the use of single-gene regressions and the use of hard-coded prior parameters rather than a hierarchical model. We have explored other approaches to these data not reported here, notably ( 8 , 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made some of these choices for convenience, such as the use of single-gene regressions and the use of hard-coded prior parameters rather than a hierarchical model. We have explored other approaches to these data not reported here, notably ( 8 , 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the AUROCs were 0.932 and 0.905 in the training and validation sets, respectively, which means that this model had a good predictive effect on BC metastasis. Furthermore, the AUROCs of previous developed predictive models ranged from 0.58 to 0.90, which means that this model was more accurate when compared to previous models 44–46 . Furthermore, this model had good Brier scores of 0.113 and 0.097 for the training and external validation sets, respectively, showing good calibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, the AUROCs of previous developed predictive models ranged from 0.58 to 0.90, which means that this model was more accurate when compared to previous models. [44][45][46] Further-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%