2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting brain structural network using functional connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional connectivity (FC), on the other hand, is commonly inferred through the correlation of nodal activities based on blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) or coherence analysis of electro- or magnetoencephalogram (EEG/MEG) signals acquired during task performance or in a resting state. In their work, Zhang et al ., 2022 provided a comprehensive summary of commonly used measurements for representing pairwise relationships between two fMRI signals. These measurements encompass correlation, partial correlation, covariance, and include both weighted and binary edges.…”
Section: Brain Connectomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional connectivity (FC), on the other hand, is commonly inferred through the correlation of nodal activities based on blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) or coherence analysis of electro- or magnetoencephalogram (EEG/MEG) signals acquired during task performance or in a resting state. In their work, Zhang et al ., 2022 provided a comprehensive summary of commonly used measurements for representing pairwise relationships between two fMRI signals. These measurements encompass correlation, partial correlation, covariance, and include both weighted and binary edges.…”
Section: Brain Connectomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a multi-layer perceptron, Sarwar and colleagues (19) achieved a correlation between empirical and predicted functional connectivity of r = 0.9 for group-averaged networks and r = 0.55 ± 0.1 for individual networks. More recently, studies have sought to predict brain function from structural connectomes and vice versa using Reinmann Networks (21), Graph Convolutional Networks (20) and GANs (22). These studies report prediction accuracies comparable to Sarwar and colleagues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised learning approaches have been proven instrumental in overcoming the limitations of mechanistic models (19), (20), (21), (22). These approaches utilize a large data set of empirical structural and functional connectome pairs to learn the unidirectional mapping between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study developed hybrid S-F markers, considering the linear S-F association. However, recent studies demonstrated the potential of non-linear models like deep neural networks to reveal more complex S-F relationships (95,96). Moreover, there are a number of functional (e.g., amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF)) and structural (e.g., structural connectivity) features that were not considered in our study.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%