2017
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks

Abstract: Binding free energy calculations based on molecular simulations provide predicted affinities for biomolecular complexes. These calculations begin with a detailed description of a system, including its chemical composition and the interactions between its components. Simulations of the system are then used to compute thermodynamic information, such as binding affinities. Because of their promise for guiding molecular design, these calculations have recently begun to see widespread applications in early stage dr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
325
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(310 reference statements)
4
325
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The T4 lysozyme L99A cavity mutant studied here has a buried binding site which readily binds non-polar molecules, making it a common model system for free energy calculations. 68 …”
Section: Theory and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T4 lysozyme L99A cavity mutant studied here has a buried binding site which readily binds non-polar molecules, making it a common model system for free energy calculations. 68 …”
Section: Theory and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a similar active area of research is the prediction of binding affinities for biomolecular complexes from molecular dynamics simulations due to the expected impact such calculations will have in early stage drug discovery. Yet these calculations have a higher level of complexity and are, thus, less mature than those devoted to solvation free energies [29]. Two types of approaches are principally used to compute standard binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations, namely the alchemical double decoupling method and the potential of mean force method, respectively [30 -33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10000, for a similar computational expense) with the low acceptance rate and still see a reasonable number of moves accepted. We believe this relative advantage of standard MC may be a peculiarity of toluene in this particular binding site (which is relatively large compared to the size of toluene, and known to be especially rigid 5,68,94,95 ), and not representative of typical MC performance in condensed phase systems. 44 To further test the relative performance of MC and NCMC, we examined performance of NCMC versus MC move proposals for a larger ligand in the lysozyme binding site, 3-iodotoluene; we find that the presence of the bulky iodo substituent dramatically impairs acceptance of MC moves, presumably due to the larger size of the ligand relative to the size of the binding site (see Section 2.9 for methods).…”
Section: Ncmc Does Not Compare As Favorably To MC For Toluene But Ncmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T4 lysozyme L99A cavity mutant studied here has a buried binding site which readily binds non-polar molecules, making it a common model system for free energy calculations. 68 Toluene, a T4 lysozyme L99A binder, was chosen as the initial ligand for testing this method for a number of reasons. One is that toluene's symmetry allows for a convenient check of correctness; symmetric binding modes should have equivalent populations with adequate sampling.…”
Section: We Study a T4 Lysozyme Cavity Mutant Which Binds Simple Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%