Predicting Attrition and Engagement in the Treatment of Young Offenders

Carl, Lena C.; Schmücker, Martin; Lösel, Friedrich

doi:10.1177/0306624x19877593

Cited by 25 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The vast majority of the treated participants ( n = 231, 63.3%) participated in the programs of social–therapeutic prisons. These institutions aim for an overall therapeutic climate and deliver individual and group therapy as well as basic education, professional training, and a stepwise opening with work outside, near the end of the sentence (for more information, see Carl, Schmucker, & Lösel, 2018; Lösel & Egg, 1997). In principle, the social–therapeutic units in Germany are more similar to hierarchic than democratic therapeutic communities in the Anglo-American world (e.g., Lipton, 2010; Shuker & Sullivan, 2010).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although there is less continuity of sexual offending in the life course than stereotypes suggest, treatment should lead to a further reduction of reoffending. Contrary to this aim, a recent large British study using propensity score matching (PSM) showed some negative effects of the core sex offender treatment program (SOTP) in prisons. International meta-analyses on the effects of sex offender treatment revealed that there is considerable variety in the results, and methodological aspects and the context play a significant role. Therefore, this study compared different designs in the evaluation of sex offender treatment in German prisons. PSM was compared with an exact matching (EM) by the Static-99 in a sample of 693 sex offenders from Bavarian prisons. Most results were similar for both methods and not significant due to low base rates. There was a treatment effect at p < .05 on general recidivism in the EM and at p = .06 on serious reoffending in the PSM. For sexual recidivism, EM showed a negative trend, whereas PSM suggested the opposite. Overall, the study underlines the need for more replications of evaluations of routine practice, methodological comparisons, sensitive outcome criteria, and differentiated policy information.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It may be that combinations of secure residential youth care with very short systemic interventions tend to reflect the unsuccessful implementation of treatment of families with whom engagement could not be achieved, leading to lower levels of parental involvement. This way, lower parental involvement could be reflective of a lack of engagement which could lead to attrition, as seen in prior research (Carl et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Residential Youth Care Combined with Systemic Interventions: Exploring Relationships between Family-Centered Care and Outcomes

Blankestein

Rijken

Broekhoven

et al. 2021

Residential Treatment for Children & Youth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family-centered care, in terms of parental involvement and family-centered staff attitude and behavior during placement in secure residential youth care, is increasingly being combined with systemic interventions. Little is known, however, about this combination of family-centered residential care and systemic interventions. This study assessed whether levels of parental involvement or family-centered staff attitude and behavior during placement predicted outcomes of systemic interventions. We first assessed the outcomes in the full sample of families receiving systemic interventions and thereafter in families receiving systemic interventions with a strong evidence base (Multidimensional Family Therapy, Multisystemic Therapy [specializing in treatment of individuals with an intellectual disability/with problem sexual behavior], Relational Family Therapy [MDFT, MST(-ID/-PSB), RGT]) and systemic interventions with a less strong evidence base (Attachment Based Family Therapy, Flexible Assertive Community Treatment [FACT], FamilyFACT, Forensic Ambulant Systemic Therapy, Systemic Therapy [ABFT, (Family)FACT, FAST, ST]). Results revealed that higher levels of parental involvement predicted less family empowerment and a longer duration of the systemic intervention. Higher levels of family-centered staff attitude and behavior predicted more parental distress, a shorter duration of the KEYWORDS Residential youth care; parental involvement; family-centered care; systemic interventions; family functioning CONTACT A. M. M. M. Blankestein

show abstract

“…The distrust and lack of help-seeking by the participants is supported by Howerton et al (2007) and Jeffreys (2016). Carl et al (2019) report low motivation, young age and substance use all predict attrition in treatment of young offenders, but that engagement reduces the impact. Schiller (2013) advocates a strong therapeutic alliance is required in the treatment of young offenders.…”

Section: Superordinate Theme 2 - Adjustment On Protectionmentioning

confidence: 83%

The experiences of young offenders (aged 18–21) on protection in an Irish prison: using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)

Hughes

Trimble

O'Rourke

2021

JCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Young offenders are disproportionately represented in the Irish Prison Service (IPS) and are a population with complex needs and highest risk of re-offending. Subsets of young offenders in IPS are placed on Protection for their own and/or other’s safety. There is limited research regarding the experiences of young offenders, and there is none on the subjective experiences of young offenders on Protection that could be identified. This study aims to address a limitation of a previous study on the experiences of young offenders in an Irish prison (Hughes et al., 2017) by providing insight into experiences of young offenders on Protection in Mountjoy Prison. Design/methodology/approach Using a non-experimental, qualitative, semi-structured interview design, a purposive sampling method was used, and six young offenders participated. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim with potentially identifiable information removed to ensure anonymity. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was applied to interpret the data. Findings Two superordinate themes provided an overview of the young offender’s experiences of Protection in an Irish prison: ‘Social Order on Protection’ and ‘Adjustment on Protection’. Research limitations/implications Even though it is a relatively small sample size, this study contributes to existing literature and considers sentence management and clinical implications. Originality/value This study helps to address a gap in literature by providing insight into the overall experiences of young male offenders (aged 18–21) on Protection in an Irish prison. The findings are in line with most researches, which highlight additional negative consequences of “restrictive prisons regimes” such as Protection. This study provides information to prisons for the development of best practice guidelines and better sentence management and delivery of services to young offenders on Protection.

show abstract

Predicting Attrition and Engagement in the Treatment of Young Offenders

Cited by 25 publications

References 47 publications

On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice

On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice

Residential Youth Care Combined with Systemic Interventions: Exploring Relationships between Family-Centered Care and Outcomes

The experiences of young offenders (aged 18–21) on protection in an Irish prison: using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About