2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting article citations using data of 100 top-cited publications in the journal Medicine since 2011

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social network analysis (SNA) was commonly applied in previous studies, [ 17 , 35 , 36 ] but there was no research, except for the one, [ 37 ] integrated different entities into SNA, such as author-affiliated nations, journals, article types, and topic categories with MeSH terms, and then displayed the dominant ones onto the Sankey diagram [ 20 ] while searching the string of “social network analysis network” and “Sankey diagram” in PubMed database thus far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social network analysis (SNA) was commonly applied in previous studies, [ 17 , 35 , 36 ] but there was no research, except for the one, [ 37 ] integrated different entities into SNA, such as author-affiliated nations, journals, article types, and topic categories with MeSH terms, and then displayed the dominant ones onto the Sankey diagram [ 20 ] while searching the string of “social network analysis network” and “Sankey diagram” in PubMed database thus far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies [ 8 , 9 ] applied the alluvial to the analysis of bibliometric data. Graphs based on the alluvial are appropriate due to the categorical dimensions instead of steps (or years) on the x-axis, as stated in definitions of the alluvial plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the classification of subject categories using SNA is objective and unique in comparison with previous studies using manual methods [ 8 ] and document types only in PubMed. [ 9 ] However, the evidence indicates that the classification is meaningful, feasible and worthy of recommendation for future studies in relevant fields (F = 1.19, P = .320).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the radar plot mentioned in the previous section, the top 2 prolific authors with the highest hT-index were selected. We made 3 comparisons in IRA between the 2 authors, including publications on the IBP, [ 39 , 40 ] keyword plus in WoSCC using the Sankey diagram, [ 41 , 42 ] and comparisons of differences in research features on the forest plot. [ 34 , 43 , 44 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%