2023
DOI: 10.1080/13621718.2023.2200572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting and optimising the surface roughness of additive manufactured parts using an artificial neural network model and genetic algorithm

Abstract: The selection of parameters affects the surface roughness in the additive manufacturing process. This study aims to determine the optimal combination of input parameters for predicting and minimising the surface roughness of samples produced by Fused Deposition Modelling on a 3D printer using a cascade-forward neural network (CFNN) and genetic algorithm. Box-Behnken Design with four independent printing parameters at three levels is used, and 25 parts are fabricated with a 3D printer. Roughness tests are perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The special issue contains contributions on the major variants of AM including laser DED [6,9,18,24], gas metal arc DED [7,[10][11][12][13][14]16,19,[21][22][23], laser PBF [8], cold spray [17], laser-arc hybrid manufacturing [20], and fused deposition modelling [15]. Chaurasia et al [22] presented a novel approach to real-time monitoring of melt pool cross-sectional asymmetry during laser PBF using a two-color thermal camera.…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The special issue contains contributions on the major variants of AM including laser DED [6,9,18,24], gas metal arc DED [7,[10][11][12][13][14]16,19,[21][22][23], laser PBF [8], cold spray [17], laser-arc hybrid manufacturing [20], and fused deposition modelling [15]. Chaurasia et al [22] presented a novel approach to real-time monitoring of melt pool cross-sectional asymmetry during laser PBF using a two-color thermal camera.…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning models provided 99% accuracy in the prediction of transient temperature distribution. Ulkir et al [15] used neural network-based machine learning to determine the optimal combination of process parameters for reducing the surface roughness of parts made by fused deposition modelling. The accuracy in predicting surface roughness using machine learning was more accurate compared to the random experimental trials.…”
Section: Articles In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This feature may be due to factors, such as surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, energy consumption, and tensile strength. [27][28][29][30] In this study, four printing parameters (infill pattern, wall thickness, infill density, and layer thickness) that have a high impact on dimensional accuracy were selected because of the studies examined. These parameters have not been examined in any study in terms of the dimensional accuracy of additively manufactured parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the relationship between input parameters and surface roughness was established using the regression model. Ulkir and Gazi aimed to determine the optimal combination of input parameters to predict and minimize the surface roughness of samples fabricated by FDM on a 3D printer using a cascaded forward neural network and a genetic algorithm (Ulkir and Akgun, 2023). The Box-Behnken design with four independent printing parameters at three levels was used, and 25 parts were fabricated with a 3D printer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%