2016
DOI: 10.17239/l1esll-2016.16.01.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting and explaining teachers’ documentation practices for students’ reading and writing difficulties

Abstract: Abstract. The overall aim of this article is to predict and explain Swedish teachers' documentation practices of students´ reading and writing difficulties. A survey study was conducted with 313 teachers. The data analysis was guided by an organizational approach to special needs education. The descriptive findings suggest that 98% of the teachers have students with reading and writing difficulties, and that there are almost 3 students with such special educational needs (=SEN) per teacher. The results of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies fall into three subgroups: one group investigated teacher perspectives on instruction in general (Graham et al, 2021;Hertzberg & Roe, 2016), with a specific focus on multimodal aspects of instruction (Tjernberg et al, 2017) or on ways of promoting early writing development (Anderson et al, 2019;Sandberg & Norling, 2020). Another group explored discourses about writing (Krogh, 2012;Sturk & Lindgren, 2019;Sturk et al, 2021), whereas the third group focused on teacher competences and practices; that is, teachers' metalanguage in talks about students' written texts (Folkeryd & Geijerstam, 2019;Liberg & Nordlund, 2019) and their documentation practices of students' reading and writing difficulties (Reichenberg 2016). Due to its scale, Graham et al (2021) is regarded as a key study within this group.…”
Section: Writing Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies fall into three subgroups: one group investigated teacher perspectives on instruction in general (Graham et al, 2021;Hertzberg & Roe, 2016), with a specific focus on multimodal aspects of instruction (Tjernberg et al, 2017) or on ways of promoting early writing development (Anderson et al, 2019;Sandberg & Norling, 2020). Another group explored discourses about writing (Krogh, 2012;Sturk & Lindgren, 2019;Sturk et al, 2021), whereas the third group focused on teacher competences and practices; that is, teachers' metalanguage in talks about students' written texts (Folkeryd & Geijerstam, 2019;Liberg & Nordlund, 2019) and their documentation practices of students' reading and writing difficulties (Reichenberg 2016). Due to its scale, Graham et al (2021) is regarded as a key study within this group.…”
Section: Writing Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%