2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1155-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting anatomical landmarks and bone morphology of the femur using local region matching

Abstract: Anatomical landmarks and features could be accurately predicted using the proposed local region matching method. This method offers robustness and accuracy in determining anatomical bony landmarks and bone morphology for clinical and biomechanical applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average errors ranges from ∼1.5 to ∼4.5 mm (depending in the landmark) in Ref. 20, and from ∼2.5 to ∼6 mm in Ref. 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average errors ranges from ∼1.5 to ∼4.5 mm (depending in the landmark) in Ref. 20, and from ∼2.5 to ∼6 mm in Ref. 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As mentioned in Sec. 1, other atlas-based landmark identification methods for musculoskeletal applications have been published, either using a single atlas 19,20 or an active shape model. 11,21 References 20 and 21 have reported landmark localization errors compared to expert readers for a variety of femoral and hip locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a ). 20 For each point in a given region of interest, the closest point on the opposite contact surface was identified. For each point (point a) in a region of interest, the closest points in two consecutive frames (points b and c) were identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an automatic identification of landmarks is preferable. However, automatic methods for landmark detection should provide reproducible results, be robust against the spatial alignment of the femur and handle the large interindividual variability 17 of the femoral morphology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%