OBJECTIVE -To evaluate the safety and efficacy of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty compared with standard, nonsurgical management of wounds at the plantar hallux interphalangeal joint in patients with diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We evaluated 41 patients with ulcers classified as University of Texas Grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using a case-control model. Case subjects were patients treated with resectional arthroplasty and control subjects received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation.RESULTS -The surgery group healed significantly faster than patients in the standard therapy group (standard 67.1 Ϯ 17.1 versus sugery 24.2 Ϯ 9.9 days, P ϭ 0.0001), and they had fewer recurrent ulcers (standard 35.0 versus surgery 4.8%, P ϭ 0.02, odds ratio 7.6, 95% CI 1.1-261.7) Both groups had similar rates of infection (standard 38.1 versus surgery 40.0%, P ϭ 0.9) and amputation (standard 10.0 versus surgery 4.8%, P ϭ 0.5).CONCLUSIONS -Results suggest that resectional arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure to treat wounds of the plantar hallux compared with nonsurgical therapy.
Diabetes Care 26:3284 -3287, 2003R eduction of pressure in treating the diabetic foot is of paramount importance in both healing and preventing neuropathic ulcerations and their eventual sequelae. However, there may be instances in which the degree of deformity is so profound or the location of the deformity is so critical that it obviates the efficacy of both a short-and long-term extrinsic solution such as therapeutic shoes and custom molded insoles. In these instances, the focus of treatment often must be directed to the intrinsic pathology to resolve deformity and abnormal shear and pressure forces on the foot. Surgical intervention to correct structural deformity or improve limited joint mobility is often necessary when other therapy has failed.Over the past decade, numerous descriptive studies have detailed various surgical techniques to treat diabetic foot wounds (1-15). Remarkably, only one comparative study has evaluated outcomes of nonablative foot surgery compared with nonsurgical methods of diabetic foot treatment (16). Although the conclusion of this study suggested that foot surgery seemed to be safe and effective, the study did not evaluate the effectiveness of any specific procedure, thereby limiting its ability to comment on procedure-related outcomes.One of the most common locations of wounds on the sole of the diabetic foot is the plantar hallux (17,18). Wounds occur in this area because of a variety of factors, most significantly limitation of motion at the metatarsophalangeal joint. This limited joint mobility leads to increased plantar pressure on the hallux, which, when combined with repetitive stress (activity during walking), results in neuropathic foot ulceration (2,19). By extension, therefore, one of the most commonly used procedur...