“…One empirical implication is that self-protection is a more urgent priority than self-advancement, given that, in general, ''bad is stronger than good'' (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Finkenauer, & Vohs, 2001). For example, the discrepancy between the self one currently is and the self one fears he or she might become predicts emotional states better than the discrepancy between the self one currently is and the self one would ideally like, or feels morally obliged, to be (Heppen & Ogilvie, 2003). Individual differences also moderate which strategy people adopt: Those with higher self-esteem prioritize self-advancement, whereas those with lower self-esteem prioritize selfVolume 3-Number 2 protection (Tice, 1991), in keeping with their corresponding tendencies towards risk-seeking or risk-aversion (Josephs, Larrick, Steele, & Nisbett, 1992).…”