2003
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.22.4.347.22898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Affect from Global Self-discrepancies: The Dual Role of the Undesired Self

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
58
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…depression and happiness), actual/feared discrepancy was the strongest predictor. Similar results based on the undesired self, according to Ogilvie (1987), were reported by Ogilvie and Clark (1992), Cheung (1997), and Heppen and Ogilvie (2003). In order to understand both approach and avoidance tendencies and anti-choice behaviour, Hogg and Banister (2001) introduced the undesired self into the field of consumer behaviour.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…depression and happiness), actual/feared discrepancy was the strongest predictor. Similar results based on the undesired self, according to Ogilvie (1987), were reported by Ogilvie and Clark (1992), Cheung (1997), and Heppen and Ogilvie (2003). In order to understand both approach and avoidance tendencies and anti-choice behaviour, Hogg and Banister (2001) introduced the undesired self into the field of consumer behaviour.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…One empirical implication is that self-protection is a more urgent priority than self-advancement, given that, in general, ''bad is stronger than good'' (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Finkenauer, & Vohs, 2001). For example, the discrepancy between the self one currently is and the self one fears he or she might become predicts emotional states better than the discrepancy between the self one currently is and the self one would ideally like, or feels morally obliged, to be (Heppen & Ogilvie, 2003). Individual differences also moderate which strategy people adopt: Those with higher self-esteem prioritize self-advancement, whereas those with lower self-esteem prioritize selfVolume 3-Number 2 protection (Tice, 1991), in keeping with their corresponding tendencies towards risk-seeking or risk-aversion (Josephs, Larrick, Steele, & Nisbett, 1992).…”
Section: Dimensions Of Self-enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between self-discrepancy theory, feared selves and emotions might translate into explaining, in part, the reflexive nature of different possible selves (feared versus ought self) and approach/avoidance motivation. Other recent work identifies the role of the undesired self within the context of selfdiscrepancy theory (Heppen and Ogilvie, 2003), which also potentially might offer some valuable additional insights into the role of emotions and discrepancy reduction. "While both ideal and feared discrepancies were correlated with dejectionrelated emotions (i.e.…”
Section: The Subordinate: Macro/molar Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%