2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting adverse events, length of stay, and discharge disposition following shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure and Charlson Comorbidity Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12) They reported both measures to be good predictors of postoperative complication, prolonged inpatient stay, discharge to a rehabilitation facility and death. (12) Whilst the Charlson Comorbity Index was higher in patients with prolonged inpatient stay in this study, the Charlson score was not significantly associated with prolonged inpatient stay on multivariate analysis, so our findings do not support this Kim et al's finding. However the Charlson co-morbidity index is made up of individual scores for co-morbidities, some of which were found to be independent predictors of prolonged length of stay, so our data suggest the effect on length of stay appears to arise from the individual co-morbidities rather than the overall Charlson Index.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…12) They reported both measures to be good predictors of postoperative complication, prolonged inpatient stay, discharge to a rehabilitation facility and death. (12) Whilst the Charlson Comorbity Index was higher in patients with prolonged inpatient stay in this study, the Charlson score was not significantly associated with prolonged inpatient stay on multivariate analysis, so our findings do not support this Kim et al's finding. However the Charlson co-morbidity index is made up of individual scores for co-morbidities, some of which were found to be independent predictors of prolonged length of stay, so our data suggest the effect on length of stay appears to arise from the individual co-morbidities rather than the overall Charlson Index.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, the CCI and the ECM were not statistically different between the readmitted and non-readmitted patients. Kim et al 18 compared the accuracy of the CCI and ECM for predicting adverse events and postoperative discharge destination after shoulder arthroplasty (TSA and RTSA). They used the National Inpatient Sample between 2002 and 2014 and found that a predictive model using the ECM, in combination with basic demographic variables, outperforms models using the CCI for predicting adverse events and discharge disposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers were selected in order to give equal weight to each comorbidity level for use as a categorical variable. 12 The Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files provided by the HCUP were used to estimate the cost of resources for patients based on the reported total charge. The HCUP used hospital specific cost-to-charge ratios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%