2021
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Accurate Lead Structures for Screening Molecular Libraries: A Quantum Crystallographic Approach

Abstract: Optimization of lead structures is crucial for drug discovery. However, the accuracy of such a prediction using the traditional molecular docking approach remains a major concern. Our study demonstrates that the employment of quantum crystallographic approach-counterpoise corrected kernel energy method (KEM-CP) can improve the accuracy by and large. We select human aldose reductase at 0.66 Å, cyclin dependent kinase 2 at 2.0 Å and estrogen receptor β at 2.7 Å resolutions with active site environment ranging fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, Pham et al 45 report a correlation coefficient between the same variables of 0.74 for a set 11 noncovalent M pro complexes. It should be noted that a direct comparison of IC 50 values with results of molecular docking gives rather a pessimistic outlook, 46,47 with docking being generally recognized as a screening tool useful for identification of potent compounds, when maintaining false-positive and false-negative rates at reasonable threshold. 48 Reliability of scoring functions is usually assessed by four aspects, namely, scoring power, ranking power, docking power, and screening power.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, Pham et al 45 report a correlation coefficient between the same variables of 0.74 for a set 11 noncovalent M pro complexes. It should be noted that a direct comparison of IC 50 values with results of molecular docking gives rather a pessimistic outlook, 46,47 with docking being generally recognized as a screening tool useful for identification of potent compounds, when maintaining false-positive and false-negative rates at reasonable threshold. 48 Reliability of scoring functions is usually assessed by four aspects, namely, scoring power, ranking power, docking power, and screening power.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%