2001
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.18.823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted Protein Structure of MedakaFoxA3and Its Expression in Polster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In online supplementary figure 1, as expected, all the medaka Fox genes can be classified into 18 subclasses, which were named from OlFoxA to OlFoxR1. However, in this study, we classified the OlFoxA3 (gi21263704) and OlFKH1 (NP_001098163) into groups A2 and A3, respectively, which diverged from published results [Okamoto et al, 2001].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In online supplementary figure 1, as expected, all the medaka Fox genes can be classified into 18 subclasses, which were named from OlFoxA to OlFoxR1. However, in this study, we classified the OlFoxA3 (gi21263704) and OlFKH1 (NP_001098163) into groups A2 and A3, respectively, which diverged from published results [Okamoto et al, 2001].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Until this study, only 5 Fox genes were characterized in medaka [Okamoto et al, 2001;Li et al, 2007]. In the present study, we set out to identify and classify those Fox genes in medaka in order to study aspects of gene evolution and developmental function of the Fox family of genes in this species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various teleosts may have different lineage‐specific sets of genes with subfunctions or neofunctions, because the gene degeneration process after genome duplication would have differently affected regulatory genes in each lineage. Thus, it is likely that gene functions differ from those of the homologous genes in mammals in some cases (Wittbrodt et al, 1998, 2002; Force et al, 1999; Rhinn and Brand, 2001; McClintock et al, 2001, 2002) and differ even among teleost fishes (Okamoto et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%