2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicted Mode of Binding to and Allosteric Modulation of the μ-Opioid Receptor by Kratom’s Alkaloids with Reported Antinociception In Vivo

Abstract: Pain management devoid of serious opioid adverse effects is still far from reach despite vigorous research and development efforts. Alternatives to classical opioids have been sought for years, and mounting reports of individuals finding pain relief with kratom have recently intensified research on this natural product. Although the composition of kratom is complex, the pharmacological characterization of its most abundant alkaloids has drawn attention to three molecules in particular, owing to their demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystal structure of active murine MOR bound to BU72 (PDB id: 5C1MF) was prepared for molecular docking of SC1, SC3, SC4, SC11, SC12, SC13, 11-F, morphine, and buprenorphine, using the protocol we recently reported in the literature for docking and simulations of kratom alkaloids, including mitragynine and 7OH mitragynine. 72 Molecular docking of morphine and buprenorphine was achieved by overlapping core heavy atoms onto the co-crystal compound BU72. In contrast, SC1, SC3, SC4, SC11, SC12, SC13, and 11-F were aligned onto mitragynine and 7OH mitragynine binding poses that had been previously obtained 72 mitragynine and mitragynine 38 were used here.…”
Section: Computational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The crystal structure of active murine MOR bound to BU72 (PDB id: 5C1MF) was prepared for molecular docking of SC1, SC3, SC4, SC11, SC12, SC13, 11-F, morphine, and buprenorphine, using the protocol we recently reported in the literature for docking and simulations of kratom alkaloids, including mitragynine and 7OH mitragynine. 72 Molecular docking of morphine and buprenorphine was achieved by overlapping core heavy atoms onto the co-crystal compound BU72. In contrast, SC1, SC3, SC4, SC11, SC12, SC13, and 11-F were aligned onto mitragynine and 7OH mitragynine binding poses that had been previously obtained 72 mitragynine and mitragynine 38 were used here.…”
Section: Computational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Metabolism of mitragynine to 7OH in vitro 24 and in dogs 25 has been reported by other groups too. More recently, we also reported an atomic-level description of how kratom alkaloids may bind and allosterically modulate MOR 21 . In vivo studies in mice revealed that kratom and a number of its alkaloids are analgesic 16,18,19,[26][27][28] ameliorate opioid physical dependence, 23,26 decrease alcohol intake 22 , and inhibit self-administration of heroin in rats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although kratom was reportedly used to substitute for opiate addiction and cure it (37), the demonstration of their binding by MsK had to await the discovery of opioid receptors (38,39). Mitragynine and other kratom alkaloids were shown to be possibly allosteric (40) agonists to opioid receptors (41)(42)(43)(44), to possess analgesic properties thanks to their binding to brain µand δ-opioid receptors, and to induce ileal and vas deferens distention through the same receptors at peripheral sites (43,45). These properties were long harnessed by traditional healers in the countries where kratom grows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve their role in signalling, we applied Shannon’s mutual information (26, 28) and McGill’s interaction information (also called co-information) (2932), as “State Specific Information” (SSI), in order to quantify information shared through coupled transitions of discrete residue and internal water states. In contrast to information theoretic approaches that analyze correlations in protein dynamics in cartesian space (most often C α motions) (6, 31, 3337), SSI derives from internal coordinate and state-based mutual information frameworks (3841). It is therefore closely aligned with the concept of GPCR microswitches by requiring a change between at least two distinct conformational states for information exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%