Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects

Abstract

BackgroundThere are few predictions about the directionality or extent of morphological trait (mis)matches between interacting organisms. We review and analyse studies on morphological trait complementarity (e.g. floral tube length versus insect mouthpart length) at the population and species level.ResultsPlants have consistently more exaggerated morphological traits than insects at high trait magnitudes and in some cases less exaggerated traits than insects at smaller trait magnitudes. This result held at the population level, as well as for phylogenetically adjusted analyses at the species-level and for both pollination and host-parasite interactions, perhaps suggesting a general pattern. Across communities, the degree of trait mismatch between one specialist plant and its more generalized pollinator was related to the level of pollinator specialization at each site; the observed pattern supports the "life-dinner principle" of selection acting more strongly on species with more at stake in the interaction. Similarly, plant mating system also affected the degree of trait correspondence because selfing reduces the reliance on pollinators and is analogous to pollination generalization.ConclusionsOur analyses suggest that there are predictable "winners" and "losers" of evolutionary arms races and the results of this study highlight the fact that breeding system and the degree of specialization can influence the outcome.

Armament Imbalances: Match and Mismatch in Plant-Pollinator Traits of Highly Specialized Long-Spurred Orchids

“…As a general pattern, plants usually have more exaggerated morphological traits than pollinators, because of the intrinsic differences in their physiological and developmental constraints [9]. Moreover, Anderson et al .…”

Individual Variation Decreases Interference Competition but Increases Species Persistence

“…We defined the quantities d 2 α ¼ x À θ α ð Þ 2 and d 2 η ¼ x À θ η À Á 2 as the distance between the mean trait in the population and the optimal value at which attack efficiency is maximal and handling time is minimal (referred to as phenotypic mismatch; see Raimundo et al, 2014;Schreiber et al, 2011 for similar definitions). Because the optimal value is set by past and existing selective pressures (Anderson et al, 2010), the phenotypic mismatch can be seen as a measure of how well adapted the consumer species is at attacking and handling a particular resource (Gibert and Brassil, 2014). The larger the mismatch is, the smaller the attack rate and the larger the handling time.…”

Bombus terrestris chegará ao Brasil? Um estudo preditivo sobre uma invasão em potencial

“…Já a modelagem ecológica trata de representações gráficas, matemáticas e argumentativas de um determinado fenômeno natural, que pode ser, por exemplo, comportamental (ex: modelos de divisão de trabalho em insetos sociais; Beshers e Fewell, 2001), espaço-temporal (interações entre abelhas e recursos florais em larga escala espacial; , físico (ex: incompatibilidade de caracteres morfológicos em interações planta-inseto; Anderson et al, 2010), químico (ex: proteínas relacionadas à comunicação química de insetos; Pelosi et al, 2006) e muitos outros. Estes fenômenos representados podem estar ligados a fatores intrínsecos ou extrínsecos (ou ambos) de organismos individuais, espécies, populações, comunidades e ecossistemas, por exemplo.…”