2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers

Abstract: SUMMARY Sensitivity to the predictability of the environment supports young children’s learning in many domains [1, 2], including language [3–6]; perception [7, 8]; and the processing of objects, space, and time [1, 9]. Predictable regularities allow observers to generate expectations about upcoming events and to learn from violations of those expectations [10, 11]. Given the benefits of detecting both predictable and unpredictable events, a key question concerns which types of input facilitate learning in you… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous research on predictable events (e.g., Bar, 2007;Benitez & Smith, 2012;Benitez & Saffran, 2018; see also Aslin, 2014), this evidence points to predictability as an important constraint on learning. Our findings suggest that even for nonlinguistic auditory structures, learning is facilitated when particular types of predictable patterns signal the structure of the input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In line with previous research on predictable events (e.g., Bar, 2007;Benitez & Smith, 2012;Benitez & Saffran, 2018; see also Aslin, 2014), this evidence points to predictability as an important constraint on learning. Our findings suggest that even for nonlinguistic auditory structures, learning is facilitated when particular types of predictable patterns signal the structure of the input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Infant word learning is also influenced by the predictability of the events within which label‐object pairings are situated. A tradeoff is apparent, with a label attached to an extremely unpredictable event (e.g., a ball floating in the air) enhancing word learning (Stahl & Feigenson, ) and a label attached to a moderately unpredictable event (e.g., a violation of a visual sequence) hindering word learning (Benitez & Saffran, ). Thus, the statistical regularities of the environment, whether derived from actual experience or from training in a laboratory, affect infants’ expectations about what is likely to occur next, influencing the ease with which infants map labels onto the objects participating in those events.…”
Section: Statistical Learning and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or their effect could be detrimental: Core knowledge violations might be so striking—because they violate deeply held beliefs about the workings of the world—that they instead disrupt further processing. Indeed, in at least some situations, children learn better from predictable events (visual sequences) than unpredicted events (Benitez & Saffran, ).…”
Section: How Might Core Knowledge Violations Influence Cognition?mentioning
confidence: 99%