Chemical monitoring provides ample evidence that organisms in their environment are exposed to complex cocktails of contaminants rather than individual chemicals. Thus, the challenge emerges on how to assess potential combined effects of such mixture exposures. The body of toxicological and ecotoxicologcial literature in the 90s suggested that combined effects of toxicological significance may indeed be caused in humans and the environment by an exposure to chemical mixtures. Furthermore, abundant statements seemed to agree that synergy was a major problem for environmental risk assessment. At the same time it was clear that an assessment of synergies based on the experimental testing of all possible mixtures occurring or anticipated in the environment was not a viable option for risk assessment. Moreover, existing uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment are not intended to account for mixture effects, and formulating additional factors that would ensure the desired level of protection could not be based on any evidence. Therefore, it seemed as if chemical risk assessment was stuck in a deadlock without any management option, and revisiting component-based methodologies for assessing combined effects appeared as the most promising approach.The empirical evidence of the time was derived mainly from studies of binary pesticide mixtures in short-term aquatic toxicity assays, which were analyzed by a plethora of different and often conflicting approaches. The confusion in terminology, methods, and conceptual premises reached almost Babylonian proportions, which lead to the widespread perception of unpredictability as the dominating feature of mixture (eco) toxicology. The various mathematical models and tools available fostered the assessment of combined effects without explicitly formulating the underlying, often fundamentally different assumptions of the different approaches. Furthermore, these assumptions were all too often not translated into consistent guidelines for the experimentalist, and descriptive tools seemed all too simplistic for a sound mixture toxicity assessment.