2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictability in financial markets: What do survey expectations tell us?

Abstract: There is widespread evidence of excess return predictability in financial markets. A potential explanation is that investors make expectational errors that are predictable. To examine this issue, we use data on survey expectations of market participants in the stock market, the foreign exchange market, and the bond and money markets in various countries. We find systematic evidence of predictable expectational errors across markets, sample periods and countries. Moreover, the predictability of expectational er… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Romer and Romer (2004) show that monetary policy shocks drawn from the Fed's Taylor rule conditional on its historical forecasts eliminate the price puzzle identified in previous work. Piazzesi and Schneider (2008), Gourinchas and Tornell (2004) and Bacchetta, Mertens, and van Wincoop (2009) all identify links between systematic forecast errors in survey forecasts and puzzles in various financial markets. Yet despite this resurgent focus on the nature of the expectations formation process, little empirical evidence exists on the size and nature of information rigidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, Romer and Romer (2004) show that monetary policy shocks drawn from the Fed's Taylor rule conditional on its historical forecasts eliminate the price puzzle identified in previous work. Piazzesi and Schneider (2008), Gourinchas and Tornell (2004) and Bacchetta, Mertens, and van Wincoop (2009) all identify links between systematic forecast errors in survey forecasts and puzzles in various financial markets. Yet despite this resurgent focus on the nature of the expectations formation process, little empirical evidence exists on the size and nature of information rigidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…UIP failed to hold at short horizons. Rather than depreciating as UIP predicted, high interest currencies were found to generally appreciate (Hodrick 1987;Engel, 1996;Bacchetta et al, 2009). Even covered interest rate parity (CIP) did not hold during turbulent periods (Taylor 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Gourinchas and Tornell (2004) find that the deviation from rational expectations has crucial implications for the currency forward premium and delayed exchange rate puzzles. Bacchetta, Mertens and Van Wincoop (2009) show that the predictability of excess returns across a broad range of assets is closely related to the explanation for the expectation errors of market participants. Piazzesi and Schneider (2011) find that the surveyed forecasts of interest rates help solve the puzzles concerning long-term bond risk premia.…”
Section: Lists Of Tables and Figuresmentioning
confidence: 95%